Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients

被引:15
|
作者
Sanaka, Madhusudhan R. [1 ]
Rai, Tarun [1 ]
Navaneethan, Udaykumar [1 ]
Gohel, Tushar D. [1 ]
Podugu, Amareshwar [1 ]
Thota, Prashanthi N. [1 ]
Lopez, Rocio [1 ]
Kiran, Ravi P. [1 ]
Burke, Carol A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Inst Digest Dis, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; AMERICAN-CANCER-SOCIETY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; FAMILY-HISTORY; COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE; SCREENING COLONOSCOPY; ASYMPTOMATIC ADULTS; CONSENSUS UPDATE; NEOPLASIA; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.019
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) are established as quality targets in average-risk (AR) individuals undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening colonoscopy. Little is known about the ADR in high-risk (HR) individuals undergoing index or surveillance colonoscopy. Objective: To determine and compare ADR in HR versus AR individuals undergoing colonoscopy. Design and Setting: Retrospective study, tertiary care center. Patients and Intervention: We reviewed records of 7357 patients who underwent colonoscopy by 66 multispecialty endoscopists at our institution during the period 2008 to 2009. Both screening and surveillance colonoscopies in AR and HR patients for CRC were studied. HR patients were further divided into 3 subgroups: those with a (1) personal history of polyps (PHP), (2) family history of polyps (FHP), and (3) family history of CRC (FHCRC). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate differences in ADR between the groups after adjusting for possible confounders. Main Outcome Measurements: ADR in HR patients. Results: The study included 4141 patients, of whom 2170 were AR and 1971 were HR. Patients in the HR group were older (64.5 +/- 9.1 years vs 59.1 +/- 7.9 years, P <.001). HR patients were more likely to have adenomas (30.7% vs 25.6%, P <.001). Adenomas were detected more often in the proximal colon than in the distal colon (29.3% vs 21.0%, P <.001 and 22.8% vs 15.8%, P <.001, respectively). Patients with a PHP had the highest ADR (33.1%, P <.001). However, after adjusting for confounders, HR status was not found to be associated with ADR (odds ratio [OR] 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.6; P =.15 for females and 0.93; 95% CI, 0.70-1.2; P =.61 for males). HR females were found to have a 40% greater likelihood of having proximal adenomas than AR females (1.4; 95% CI, 1.01-2; P =.04). Limitations: Retrospective design, single tertiary center. Conclusions: Patients with a PHP have a significantly higher ADR compared with AR patients. Defining a minimum target ADR for individuals with a PHP undergoing surveillance colonoscopy is important.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 178
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adenoma Detection Rate in High Risk Patients Differs from Average Risk Patients ACG Colorectal Cancer Prevention Award Presidential Poster
    Sanaka, Madhusudhan
    Gohel, Tushar
    Podugu, Amareshwar
    Rai, Tarun
    Kiran, Pokala
    Thota, Prashanthi
    Lopez, Rocio
    Burke, Carol
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 107 : S802 - S803
  • [2] Increased Adenoma Detection Rate in an Average-Risk Urban Population
    Zeddun, Steven
    Rieders, Brandon
    Lattimer, Lakshmi
    Dougherty, Timothy
    Borum, Marie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 : S616 - S616
  • [3] Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans
    El-Halabi, Mustapha M.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Saito, Akira
    Eckert, George J.
    Kahi, Charles J.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (01) : 137 - 143
  • [4] SURVEILLANCE FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER IN AVERAGE-RISK PATIENTS, FAMILIAL HIGH-RISK GROUPS, AND PATIENTS WITH ADENOMAS
    WINAWER, SJ
    SHERLOCK, P
    [J]. CANCER, 1982, 50 (11) : 2609 - 2614
  • [5] Adenoma Detection Rate in Average-Risk Population: An Observational Consecutive Retrospective Study
    He, Xiaoyan
    Lv, Xiangyin
    Zhang, Binbin
    Ying, Xiaoxuan
    Hu, Chiyu
    Zhou, Xiaoying
    Hu, Jianwen
    [J]. CANCER CONTROL, 2023, 30
  • [6] Trend of the polyp and adenoma detection rate by sex and age in asymptomatic average-risk and high-risk individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy, 2012-2019
    Valian, Hengameh
    Emami, Mohammad Hassan
    Heidari, Aida
    Amjadi, Elham
    Fahim, Alireza
    Lalezarian, Anasik
    Dehkordi, Sayed Ali Ehsan
    Maghool, Fatemeh
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2023, 36
  • [7] IBD Patients Have a Lower Adenoma Detection Rate Than the Average-Risk Screening Population at a University Medical Center
    Zeddun, Steven
    Al-shahrani, Abdullah
    Khanijow, Vikesh
    Lattimer, Lakshmi
    Dougherty, Timothy
    Al-Jaser, Wadha
    Rieders, Brandon
    Borum, Marie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 : S614 - S614
  • [8] Magnetic resonance colonography in the detection of colonic neoplasm in high-risk and average-risk individuals
    Leung, WK
    Lam, WWM
    Wu, JCY
    So, NMC
    Fung, SSL
    Chan, FKL
    To, KF
    Yeung, DTK
    Sung, JJY
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [9] Screening for celiac disease in average-risk and high-risk populations
    Aggarwal, Saurabh
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    Green, Peter H. R.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 5 (01): : 37 - 47
  • [10] Screening Guidelines Update for Average-Risk and High-Risk Women
    Lee, Cindy S.
    Monticciolo, Debra L.
    Moy, Linda
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (02) : 316 - 323