Regulation of Genetically Engineered Crops in India: Implications of Policy Uncertainty for Social Welfare, Competition, and Innovation

被引:9
|
作者
Kolady, Deepthi Elizabeth [1 ]
Herring, Ronald J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Int Programs, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Govt, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY; TRANSGENIC CROPS; COTTON; EGGPLANT;
D O I
10.1111/cjag.12055
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
India is the regional leader in research and development (R&D) in agricultural biotechnology (agri-biotech) in South Asia. Commercialization of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cottonthe first and only commercial genetically engineered (GE) crop in Indiain 2002 was preceded by illegal cultivation and diffusion of unapproved cultivars, raising serious questions of the state's regulatory capacity. Bt eggplant, the first GE food crop to get approval for environmental release in 2009, has not yet been commercialized. An indefinite moratorium on its commercialization was imposed by the Minister of Environment and Forests in 2010. We examine the regulatory framework in India and use the cases of Bt cotton and Bt eggplant regulation to examine the types and sources of nonmarket failures associated with the regulatory policy. We also analyze the demonstrated and likely effects of regulatory uncertainty on social welfare and development of the agri-biotech industry. We adopt implementation analysis to suggest policy options worth considering to address the nonmarket failures of regulatory policy.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 490
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetically engineered crops and responsible innovation
    Biddle, Justin B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2017, 4 (01) : 24 - 42
  • [2] Regulation of foods derived from genetically engineered crops
    Mitten, DH
    MacDonald, R
    Klonus, D
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1999, 10 (03) : 298 - 302
  • [3] Policy implications of competition between conventional and energy crops
    Knapek, J.
    Kralik, T.
    Vavrova, K.
    Valentova, M.
    Horak, M.
    Outrata, D.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 151
  • [4] Innovation, governance, and capabilities: implications for competition policy
    Teece, David J.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2020, 29 (05) : 1075 - 1099
  • [5] INNOVATION AND COMPETITION IN RETAILING - IMPLICATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL POLICY
    SPRANZI, A
    [J]. RIVISTA INTERNAZIONALE DI SCIENZE ECONOMICHE E COMMERCIALI, 1978, 25 (01): : 55 - 68
  • [6] CSR in an oligopoly with foreign competition: Policy and welfare implications
    Liu, Qian
    Wang, Leonard F. S.
    Chen, Charlie L.
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2018, 72 : 1 - 7
  • [7] Regulatory Oversight of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms: Has Regulation Inhibited Innovation?
    Roger P. Wrubel
    Sheldon Krimsky
    Molly D. Anderson
    [J]. Environmental Management , 1997, 21 : 571 - 586
  • [8] Regulatory oversight of genetically engineered microorganisms: Has regulation inhibited innovation?
    Wrubel, RP
    Krimsky, S
    Anderson, MD
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 21 (04) : 571 - 586
  • [9] Environment and its Forms of Knowledge: The Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops in India
    Aga, Aniket
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPING SOCIETIES, 2021, 37 (02) : 167 - 183
  • [10] Integrated transport policy implications for regulation and competition
    Niemeier, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2002, 8 (02) : 131 - 132