The NHDPlus dataset, watershed subdivision and SWAT model performance

被引:17
|
作者
Chiang, Li-Chi [1 ]
Yuan, Yongping [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl United Univ, Dept Civil & Disaster Prevent Engn, Miaoli 36003, Taiwan
[2] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, NERL ESD Landscape Ecol Branch, Las Vegas, NV 89193 USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
SWAT simulation; NHDPlus; watershed subdivision; HRU definition; runoff; sediment; total nitrogen; CALIBRATION; SIMULATION; SEDIMENT; SENSITIVITY; VALIDATION; MULTISITE; SCENARIOS; IMPACTS; BASIN; TEXAS;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2014.916408
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) has been developed to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural management practices on watershed water quality. Many studies have indicated that watershed subdivision can affect the accuracy of model predictions. Most of them used the minimum drainage area (MDA) to delineate sub-watersheds, and varied the value of MDA depending on the size of the watershed being modelled. Instead of MDA, we use the National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus)-an integration of the best features of the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD), National Elevation Dataset (NED), and the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD)-to delineate the watershed. The Kaskaskia River watershed in Illinois, USA, was selected to investigate the individual effects of sub-watershed and hydrologic response unit (HRU) delineations on predicted streamflow, total suspended sediment (TSS) and total nitrogen (TN) losses at two USGS gauges. In addition, an MDA of 3000 ha, and four levels of stream (the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th order) were evaluated. Three levels of HRU threshold (5%, 10% and 15%) were used for each stream order model. The results show that stream order had little effect on predicted streamflow, but a great impact on TSS and TN losses, and the impact of HRU delineation became greater when a higher stream order was used to delineate the watershed. For higher stream order, fewer streams were recognized in SWAT simulations, which resulted in less sediment routing and channel processes, which, in turn, led to less deposition in the channels; thus high sediment losses were obtained at the watershed outlet. However, fewer channel processes led to less in-stream N processes; thus lower TN losses. Overall, the SWAT simulations performed the best when the 2nd stream order was used for delineations comparing with USGS observed data, followed by the 3rd stream order. Therefore, to fully depict the watershed characteristics to perform SWAT simulations, a stream order higher than 3rd order is not recommended for watershed delineation.
引用
收藏
页码:1690 / 1708
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Watershed Subdivision on SWAT Modeling with Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty
    Gong, Yongwei
    Shen, Zhenyao
    Liu, Ruimin
    Wang, Xiujuan
    Chen, Tao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2010, 15 (12) : 1070 - 1074
  • [2] Effect of watershed subdivision on swat flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions
    Jha, M
    Gassman, PW
    Secchi, S
    Gu, R
    Arnold, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2004, 40 (03): : 811 - 825
  • [3] Role of watershed subdivision on modeling the effectiveness of best management practices with SWAT
    Arabi, M
    Govindaraju, RS
    Hantush, MM
    Engel, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2006, 42 (02): : 513 - 528
  • [4] Effect of Watershed Subdivision and Filter Width on SWAT Simulation of a Coastal Plain Watershed1
    Cho, Jaepil
    Lowrance, Richard R.
    Bosch, David D.
    Strickland, Timothy C.
    Her, Younggu
    Vellidis, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2010, 46 (03): : 586 - 602
  • [5] Impact of Watershed Subdivision and Soil Data Resolution on SWAT Model Calibration and Parameter Uncertainty1
    Kumar, Sanjiv
    Merwade, Venkatesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2009, 45 (05): : 1179 - 1196
  • [6] The Watershed Flow and Allocation Model: An NHDPlus-Based Watershed Modeling Approach for Multiple Scales and Conditions
    Eddy, Michele C.
    Moreda, Fekadu G.
    Dykes, Robert M.
    Bergenroth, Brandon
    Parks, Aaron
    Rineer, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2017, 53 (01): : 6 - 29
  • [7] River Network Routing on the NHDPlus Dataset
    David, Cedric H.
    Maidment, David R.
    Niu, Guo-Yue
    Yang, Zong-Liang
    Habets, Florence
    Eijkhout, Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2011, 12 (05) : 913 - 934
  • [8] Integration of watershed tools and SWAT model into BASINS
    Di Luzio, M
    Srinivasan, R
    Arnold, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2002, 38 (04): : 1127 - 1141
  • [9] Sensitivity analysis of SWAT model to the spatial rainfall distribution and watershed subdivision in streamflow simulations in the Mediterranean context: a case study in the Joumine watershed. Tunisia.
    Aouissi, Jalel
    Benabdallah, Sihem
    Chabaane, Zohra Lili
    Cudennec, Christophe
    [J]. 2013 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELING, SIMULATION AND APPLIED OPTIMIZATION (ICMSAO), 2013,
  • [10] Application of the SWAT hydrologic model to a tropical watershed at Brazil
    Fukunaga, Danilo Costa
    Cecilio, Roberto Avelino
    Zanetti, Sidney Sara
    Oliveira, Lais Thomazini
    Costa Caiado, Marco Aurelio
    [J]. CATENA, 2015, 125 : 206 - 213