Optimal control of risk exposure, reinsurance and investments for insurance portfolios

被引:79
|
作者
Irgens, C
Paulsen, J
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Math, N-5008 Bergen, Norway
[2] Norwegian Hull Club, N-5803 Bergen, Norway
来源
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS | 2004年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
optimal control; diffusion perturbated risk process; Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellmann equation; proportional reinsurance; excess of loss reinsurance; investment strategy;
D O I
10.1016/j.insmatheco.2004.04.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider an insurance company whose insurance business follows a diffusion perturbated classical risk process. Assets can be invested in a risk-free asset or in a risky one, the return of the latter follows an independent diffusion perturbated classical risk process (in finance it is called a jump-diffusion process). The company can dynamically control the proportion of the insurance business that is ceded to reinsurers, and in addition it can dynamically cover parts of its remaining business using excess of loss reinsurance. It can also dynamically control the proportion of the assets it invests in the risky asset. We seek to find the controls that maximize expected utility of assets at a terminal time. We do so for three different utility functions. Let T be a fixed time and T-y be the time of ruin, i.e. the first time assets become nonpositive. Then the utility functions and terminal times are: 1. U(y) = (max{0, y})(c), 0 < c < 1 and terminal time is T boolean AND T-y. 2. U(y) = In y when y > 0 and U(y) = -infinity when y less than or equal to 0. Terminal time is T. 3. U(y) = -e(-cy), c > 0, and terminal time is T. It turns out that in spite of the complexity of the problem, provided there are no complicating constraints on the controls, the problems have rather simple solutions. Our vehicle is the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellmann equations, and we seek to verify that the suggested solutions are in fact optimal among a fairly large easily verifiable admissible class of controls. We also discuss quantitative and qualitative aspects of the solutions. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 51
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal dynamic reinsurance policies for large insurance portfolios
    Taksar, MI
    Markussen, C
    [J]. FINANCE AND STOCHASTICS, 2003, 7 (01) : 97 - 121
  • [2] Optimal dynamic reinsurance policies for large insurance portfolios
    Michael I. Taksar
    Charlotte Markussen
    [J]. Finance and Stochastics, 2003, 7 : 97 - 121
  • [3] On reinsurance and investment for large insurance portfolios
    Luo, Shangzhen
    Taksar, Michael
    Tsoi, Allanus
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2008, 42 (01): : 434 - 444
  • [4] OPTIMAL INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE POLICIES IN THE RISK PROCESS
    Golubin, A. Y.
    [J]. ASTIN BULLETIN, 2008, 38 (02): : 383 - 397
  • [5] Optimal Portfolios for Regular Investments
    Mukherji, Sandip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTING, 2006, 15 (04): : 79 - 87
  • [6] Optimal insurance in the presence of reinsurance
    Zhuang, Sheng Chao
    Boonen, Tim J.
    Tan, Ken Seng
    Xu, Zuo Quan
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2017, (06) : 535 - 554
  • [7] Weighted entropy and optimal portfolios for risk-averse Kelly investments
    Kelbert, M.
    Stuhl, I.
    Suhov, Y.
    [J]. AEQUATIONES MATHEMATICAE, 2018, 92 (01) : 165 - 200
  • [8] Weighted entropy and optimal portfolios for risk-averse Kelly investments
    M. Kelbert
    I. Stuhl
    Y. Suhov
    [J]. Aequationes mathematicae, 2018, 92 : 165 - 200
  • [9] The Choice of Optimal Reinsurance of Flood Insurance
    Zhang Lin
    Shen Zhigang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2012 CHINA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 476 - 481
  • [10] Optimal insurance and reinsurance policies chosen jointly in the individual risk model
    Golubin, A. Y.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2016, (03) : 181 - 197