Management and outcome of patients with blunt splenic injury and preexisting liver cirrhosis

被引:14
|
作者
Bugaev, Nikolay [1 ]
Breeze, Janis L. [2 ]
Daoud, Vladimir [1 ]
Arabian, Sandra Strack [1 ]
Rabinovici, Reuven [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Tufts Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Tufts Med Ctr, Div Trauma & Acute Care Surg, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Boston, MA 02111 USA
来源
关键词
Blunt splenic injury; liver cirrhosis; nonoperative management; NTDB; TRAUMA DATA-BANK; NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; FAILURE; IMPACT; EMBOLIZATION; SURVIVAL; SPLEEN; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000000244
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The response of liver cirrhosis (LC) patients to abdominal trauma, including blunt splenic injury (BSI) is unfavorable. To better understand the response to BSI in LC patients, the present study reviewed a much larger group of such patients, derived from the National Trauma Data Bank. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for 2002 to 2010, and all adult BSI patients without severe brain trauma were identified. LC and non-LC patients were compared using nonoperative management (NOM) failure and mortality as primary outcomes. Predictors of these outcomes in LC patients were identified. RESULTS: Of the 77,753 identified BSI patients, 289 (0.37%) had LC. Overall, 90% of the patients underwent initial NOM (86% in LC and 90% in non-LC patients, p = 0.091) with a global 90% success rate. Compared with non-LC patients, LC patients had a lower NOM success rate (83% vs. 90%, p = 0.004) despite increased use of splenic artery angioembolization (13% vs. 8%, p = 0.001). LC patients also had more complications per patient, an increased hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, and a higher mortality (22% vs. 6%, p < 0.0001), which was independent of the treatment paradigm. In the LC group, mortality in those who underwent immediate surgery was 35% versus 46% in failed NOM (p = 0.418) and 14% (p = 0.019) in successful NOM patients. LC patients who did not require surgery were more likely to survive than those who had surgery alone (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.30). Preexisting coagulopathy (AOR, 3.28) and Grade 4 to 5 BSI (AOR, 11.6) predicted NOM failure in LC patients, whereas male sex (AOR, 4.34), hypotension (AOR, 3.15), preexisting coagulopathy (AOR, 3.06), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 13 (AOR, 6.33) predicted mortality. CONCLUSION: LC patients have a higher rate of complications, mortality, and NOM failure compared with non-LC patients. Because LC patients with failed NOM have a mortality rate similar to those undergoing immediate surgery, judgment must be exerted in selecting initial management options. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014; 76: 1354-1361. Copyright (C) 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)
引用
收藏
页码:1354 / 1361
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Liver cirrhosis: An unfavorable factor for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury
    Fang, JF
    Chen, RJ
    Lin, BC
    Hsu, YB
    Kao, JL
    Chen, MF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 54 (06): : 1131 - 1136
  • [2] Conservative management of splenic lesions: Experience in 136 patients with blunt splenic injury
    Hilario Barrio, A.
    Borruel Nacenta, S.
    Pla Romero, A.
    Sanchez Guerrero, A.
    Garcia Fuentes, C.
    Chico Fernandez, M.
    Roldan Ramos, J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA, 2010, 52 (05): : 442 - 449
  • [3] NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT SPLENIC INJURY
    FITZGERALD, R
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 303 (6795): : 188 - 188
  • [4] Management of blunt splenic injury in patients with concurrent infectious mononucleosis
    Meguid, AA
    Ivascu, FA
    Bair, HA
    Kerr, H
    Bendick, PJ
    McFall, RK
    Howells, GA
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2004, 70 (09) : 801 - 804
  • [5] Management of blunt pediatric hepatic and splenic injury: Similar process, different outcome
    Paddock, HN
    Tepas, JJ
    Ramenofsky, ML
    Vane, DW
    Discala, C
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2004, 70 (12) : 1068 - 1072
  • [6] An alternative option in the management of blunt splenic injury
    Bodansky, David
    Jones, Robert
    Tucker, Olga N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2013, (08):
  • [7] Emergency Management of Blunt Splenic Injury in Hypotensive Patients: Total Splenectomy Versus Splenic Angioembolization
    Guinto, Robyn
    Greenberg, Patricia
    Ahmed, Nasim
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2020, 86 (06) : 690 - 694
  • [8] Recent changes in the management of blunt splenic injury: effect on splenic trauma patients and hospital implications
    Sinha, S.
    Raja, S. V. V.
    Lewis, M. H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2008, 90 (02) : 109 - 112
  • [9] Predicting clinical outcome of nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: Using CT to reveal abnormalities of splenic vasculature
    Gavant, ML
    Schurr, M
    Flick, PA
    Croce, MA
    Fabian, TC
    Gold, RE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (01) : 207 - 212
  • [10] Does Splenic Embolization and Grade of Splenic Injury Impact Nonoperative Management in Patients Sustaining Blunt Splenic Trauma?
    Jeremitsky, Elan
    Kao, Amy
    Carlton, Chad
    Rodriguez, Aurelio
    Ong, Adrian
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2011, 77 (02) : 215 - 220