Perioperative and Functional Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Octogenarian Men

被引:5
|
作者
Shahait, Mohammed [1 ,2 ]
Dobbs, Ryan W. [1 ]
Kim, Jessica L. [1 ]
Eldred, Nancy [3 ]
Liang, Karren [4 ]
Huynh, Linda M. [4 ]
Ahlering, Thomas E. [4 ]
Patel, Vipul [3 ]
Lee, David I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Amman, Jordan
[3] Advent Hlth Global Robot Inst, Celebration, FL USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA 92668 USA
关键词
prostatectomy; octogenarians; prostatic neoplasms; urinary incontinence; erectile dysfunction; DECISION-MAKING; CANCER; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; OLD;
D O I
10.1089/end.2020.0859
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The functional and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in octogenarians are not well studied. We sought to study the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of RARP in octogenarian men. Methods: Between January 2009 and 2019, 46 patients >= 80 years with localized prostate cancer (PCa) underwent RARP in three high-volume robotic urologic practices in the United States. Clinical and pathologic features, and perioperative and postoperative complications were retrospectively evaluated. Functional outcomes for urinary and sexual function were collected via patient-reported questionnaires. Continence was defined as the use of zero or one safety pad per day. Results: The median (interquartile range) age was 81 (80-82), the mean (standard deviation [SD]) operative time was 116.5 (36.4) minutes, and the mean (SD) blood loss was 132 (35.6) mL. All cases were completed robotically, no intraoperative complications were encountered, and the mean length of stay was 1.21 (0.78) days. Regarding 30- and 90-day complication, nine patients had postoperative complications; seven were Clavien-Dindo grade I-II, and two were Clavien-Dindo grade >= III. Post-RARP continence rates at 3 and 12 months were 68.4% and 84.8%, respectively. Conclusions: RARP represents a feasible option to treat PCa in well-selected octogenarian men. Careful patient selection and counseling are critical before offering surgical treatment for these men.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1029
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. open radical prostatectomy
    Trinh, Q. D.
    Sammon, J.
    Ghani, K. R.
    Jeong, W.
    Jhaveri, J.
    Sukumar, S.
    Dabaja, A.
    Friedman, A.
    Ehlert, M.
    Muhletaler, F.
    Agarwal, P. K.
    Rogers, C. G.
    Peabody, J. O.
    Menon, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E679 - U450
  • [2] PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VS. OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Sun, Maxine
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Ravi, Praful
    Jeong, Wooju
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Bianchi, Marco
    Schmitges, Jan
    Jhaveri, Jay
    Hansen, Jens
    Sukumar, Shyam
    Dabaja, Ali
    Muhletaler, Fred
    Agarwal, Piyush K.
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Peabody, James O.
    Menon, Mani
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E542 - E543
  • [3] ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN YOUNG MEN
    Wambi, Chris
    Diaz-Insua, Mireya
    Muhletaler, Fred
    Peabody, James
    Menon, Mani
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E541 - E541
  • [4] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. open radical prostatectomy: latest evidences on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Mazzone, Elio
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [5] Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Perioperative Outcomes of 1500 Cases
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (10) : 2299 - 2305
  • [6] Clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Murakami, Tomohiko
    Otsubo, Satoshi
    Namitome, Ryo
    Shiota, Masaki
    Inokuchi, Junichi
    Takeuchi, Ario
    Kashiwagi, Eiji
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Eto, Masatoshi
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (05) : 575 - 581
  • [7] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Yusuf Arikan
    Mithat Eksi
    Ali Ihsan Tasci
    Updates in Surgery, 2023, 75 : 1027 - 1035
  • [8] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Arikan, Yusuf
    Eksi, Mithat
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (04) : 1027 - 1035
  • [9] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes
    Boylu, Ugur
    Basatac, Cem
    Turan, Turgay
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 38 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [10] FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF LAPAROSCOPIC VS ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Paciotti, Marco
    Nocera, Luigi
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Saitta, Cesare
    Piro, Adele
    Sarchi, Luca
    Contieri, Roberto
    Angelo, Mottaran
    Lores, Maria Peraire
    Balestrazzi, Eleonora
    Piramide, Federico
    De Groote, Ruben
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Casale, Paolo
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Buffi, Nicolo Maria
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E1161 - E1161