Structured Observation Instruments Assessing Instructional Practices With Gifted and Talented Students: A Review of the Literature

被引:7
|
作者
Farah, Yara N. [1 ]
Chandler, Kimberley L. [1 ]
机构
[1] William & Mary, Ctr Gifted Educ, Williamsburg, VA USA
关键词
evaluation; differentiation; professional development; teacher preparation; CLASSROOM; TEACHERS;
D O I
10.1177/0016986218758439
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Teaching and learning are part of a complex interaction between teachers and students. Educational leaders cannot improve the teaching and learning process without quality measurement of effective teaching. One way to capture this complex interaction is by using structured observations. However, the extant literature on classroom observation instruments in the field of gifted education is limited. For that reason, a systematic search was undertaken to identify the observation instruments for assessing instructional practices used with gifted and talented students. In this article, eight observation instruments were identified: (a) Rating Scale of Significant Behaviors in Teachers of the Gifted, (b) Kulieke's adaptation of the Rating Scale of Significant Behaviors in Teachers of the Gifted, (c) Teaching Observation Form (TOF; also known as Purdue Observation Form), (d) Classroom Practices Record (CPR), (e) Classroom Practices Record-Form VA (CPR-Form VA), (f) Classroom Instructional Practices Scale (CIPS), (g) Classroom Observation Scales-Revised (COS-R), and (h) Differentiated Classroom Observation Scale (DCOS). The instruments are described in terms of developmental process, purpose, and any reliability and validity evidence reported. This systematic search has shown the need for a new observation instrument that is comprehensive and closely tied to professional standards.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 288
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is Gifted Education a Bright Idea? Assessing the Impact of Gifted and Talented Programs on Students
    Bui, Sa A.
    Craig, Steven G.
    Imberman, Scott A.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2014, 6 (03) : 30 - 62
  • [2] Best Practices in Identifying Students for Gifted and Talented Education Programs
    Worrell, Frank
    Erwin, Jesse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 27 (04) : 319 - 340
  • [3] Assessment Practices and the Underrepresentation of Minority Students in Gifted and Talented Education
    Erwin, Jesse O.
    Worrell, Frank C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 30 (01) : 74 - 87
  • [4] Use of an instructional management system to enhance math instruction of gifted and talented students
    Ysseldyke, J
    Tardrew, S
    Betts, J
    Thill, T
    Hannigan, E
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED, 2004, 27 (04) : 293 - 310
  • [5] Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature
    Matthews, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED, 2004, 28 (01) : 77 - 113
  • [6] LEARNING STYLES AMONG GIFTED-TALENTED STUDENTS - INSTRUCTIONAL-TECHNIQUE PREFERENCES
    STEWART, ED
    [J]. EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 1981, 48 (02) : 134 - 138
  • [7] Factors Affecting the Perceptions and Practices of Differentiated Curricula and Pedagogies for Gifted and Talented Students
    Kaplan, Sandra N.
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [8] A national view of promising programs and practices for culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse gifted and talented students
    Briggs, Christine J.
    Reis, Sally M.
    Sullivan, Erin E.
    [J]. GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2008, 52 (02) : 131 - 145
  • [9] Transportation Engineering Instructional practices Analytic Review of the Literature
    Hurwitz, David S.
    Bernhardt, Kristen L. Sanford
    Turochy, Rod E.
    Young, Rhonda K.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2015, (2480) : 45 - 54
  • [10] RETHINKING PRACTICES WITH GIFTED STUDENTS: A REVIEW BASED ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
    Costa-Lobo, C.
    Silva, S.
    Stoltz, T.
    Ermida Ponte, F.
    Menezes, J.
    Vazquez-Justo, E.
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2019), 2019, : 643 - 650