Gemcitabine and pemetrexed administered in rapid sequence as front-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II clinical trial

被引:11
|
作者
West, H. L. [1 ]
Wakelee, H. A. [2 ]
Perry, M. C. [3 ]
Belt, R. J. [4 ]
Chen, R.
Obasaju, C. [5 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Canc Inst, Thorac Oncol Program, Dept Med Oncol, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Stanford Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Div Oncol, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Ellis Fischel Canc Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol Med Oncol, Columbia, MO USA
[4] Kansas City Canc Ctr, Kansas City, MO USA
[5] Eli Lilly & Co, US Oncol, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
gemcitabine; immediate administration; NSCLC; pemetrexed; rapid-sequence administration; ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS; MULTITARGETED ANTIFOLATE; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; LY231514; REGIMENS; THERAPY; MTA;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdn715
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies of the gemcitabine-pemetrexed combination in patients with late-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) utilized a 90-min delay between gemcitabine and pemetrexed administration. This phase II study evaluated activity when these agents were administered in rapid succession. Materials and methods: Chemonaive patients with late-stage NSCLC received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, with pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) immediately following day 8 gemcitabine every 21 days for six cycles, folic acid, B-12, and steroid prophylaxis. Results: Fifty-four enrolled patients (53 treated) completed a median of four cycles. Median dose intensity was 84% (gemcitabine) and 83% (pemetrexed); 68% of patients required dose adjustments. Response was as follows: complete response, 0; partial response, 7 (13%); stable disease, 29 (54%); progressive disease, 9 (17%); and unknown/unavailable, 9 (17%). Median progression-free and overall survival was 4.6 and 12.4 months, respectively. Common grade 3 or 4 toxic effects were as follows: neutropenia (40%); fatigue and dyspnea (21% each); pneumonia (17%); febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (11% each); and anemia (6%). Conclusions: The gemcitabine-pemetrexed combination is minimally active in late-stage NSCLC, with a high incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxic effects requiring frequent dose adjustments. A gemcitabine dose < 1250 mg/m(2) warrants consideration for future trials exploring this doublet. Administering day 8 pemetrexed immediately after gemcitabine does not appear to negatively impact therapeutic index.
引用
收藏
页码:850 / 856
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized phase II trial of three schedules of pemetrexed and gemcitabine as front-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Ma, CX
    Nair, S
    Thomas, S
    Mandrekar, SJ
    Nikcevich, DA
    Rowland, KM
    Fitch, TR
    Windschitl, HE
    Hillman, SL
    Schild, SE
    Jett, JR
    Obasaju, C
    Adjei, AA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (25) : 5929 - 5937
  • [2] Front-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with docetaxel and gemcitabine: A multicenter phase II trial
    Georgoulias, V
    Kouroussis, C
    Androulakis, N
    Kakolyris, S
    Dimopoulos, MA
    Papadakis, E
    Bouros, D
    Apostolopoulou, F
    Papadimitriou, C
    Agelidou, A
    Hatzakis, K
    Kalbakis, K
    Kotsakis, A
    Vardakis, N
    Vlachonicolis, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (03) : 914 - 920
  • [3] Front-line paclitaxel and topotecan chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial
    Stathopoulos, G. P.
    Katis, C.
    Tsavdaridis, D.
    Dimitroulis, J.
    Karaindros, D.
    Stathopoulos, J.
    Dimou, E.
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 58 (04) : 555 - 560
  • [4] Front-line paclitaxel and topotecan chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial
    G. P. Stathopoulos
    C. Katis
    D. Tsavdaridis
    J. Dimitroulis
    D. Karaindros
    J. Stathopoulos
    E. Dimou
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2006, 58 : 555 - 560
  • [5] Administration of pemetrexed immediately following gemcitabine as front-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II trial
    Treat, Joseph
    Bonomi, Philip
    McCleod, Michael
    Christiansen, Neal P.
    Mintzer, David M.
    Monberg, Matthew J.
    Ye, Zhishen
    Chen, Ruqin
    Obasaju, Coleman K.
    LUNG CANCER, 2006, 53 (01) : 77 - 83
  • [6] Front-line paclitaxel and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I–II trial
    G P Stathopoulos
    J Dimitroulis
    D Antoniou
    C Katis
    D Tsavdaridis
    O Armenaki
    C Marosis
    P Michalopoulou
    T Grigoratou
    J Stathopoulos
    British Journal of Cancer, 2005, 93 : 1106 - 1111
  • [7] Pemetrexed (P) plus gemcitabine (G) as front-line chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A phase II clinical trial.
    McCleod, M
    Treat, J
    Christiansen, NP
    Mintzer, DM
    Bonomi, P
    Bloss, LP
    Taylor, L
    Monberg, MJ
    Ye, Z
    Obasaju, CK
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 650S - 650S
  • [8] Front-line paclitaxel and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II trial
    Stathopoulos, GP
    Dimitroulis, J
    Antoniou, D
    Katis, C
    Tsavdaridis, D
    Armenaki, O
    Marosis, C
    Michalopoulou, P
    Grigoratou, T
    Stathopoulos, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (10) : 1106 - 1111
  • [9] Front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with docetaxel and Gemcitabine: A multicenter phase II trial
    Georgoulias, V
    Kourousis, C
    Kakolyris, S
    Dimopoulos, MA
    Papadakis, E
    Apostolopulou, F
    Agelidou, A
    Tzianni, V
    Sarra, E
    Vardakis, N
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1998, 9 : 94 - 94
  • [10] Pemetrexed (P) plus gemcitabine (G) as front-line chemotherapy for patients (Pts) with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A phase II clinical trial.
    West, H
    Belt, RJ
    Wakelee, HA
    Bloss, LP
    Taylor, L
    Monberg, MJ
    Ye, Z
    Obasaju, CK
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 649S - 649S