Research general practices: What, who and why?

被引:0
|
作者
Smith, LFP
机构
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 1997年 / 47卷 / 415期
关键词
research in general practice; research funding;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: By the autumn of 1995, 14 research general practices had been funded. These are service NHS general medical practices that are supportive of primary care research and have a lead GP who has research experience as evidenced by publication in peer-reviewed journals. Aim: To ascertain the characteristics of those who have been successful in securing the first 14 grants, the effect the process has had on them, and the practical advice they would offer to future applicants and to future funding bodies. Method: A confidential postal survey of research general practices. Results: They are atypical practices (high level of research and teaching involvement, mostly non-urban) with atypical lead GPs (male, research degrees, possess MRCGP, publications and grants obtained). Practices contemplating applying for future research practice grants should consider planning ahead, use of grant monies, protection of research time, involving the primary health care team, and sources of both internal and external support. Funding bodies need to make adequate funding available for capital expenditure and running costs as well as staff and lead GP time. Conclusion: Research general practices are ideal for integrating the core values of the medical profession, providing clinical care by medical generalists, teaching the discipline and researching its basis. Such practices should be funded on a rolling basis and throughout the United Kingdom. Future evaluation of funding such practices is needed and should confirm their utility both to the discipline and to patient care within the NHS.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 86
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Qualitative Research The "What,'' "Why,'' "Who,'' and "How''!
    Cypress, Brigitte S.
    [J]. DIMENSIONS OF CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2015, 34 (06) : 356 - 361
  • [2] Social media for pediatric research: what, who, why, and #?
    Bamat, Nicolas A.
    Manley, Brett J.
    Harer, Matthew W.
    Roland, Damian
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2018, 84 (05) : 597 - 599
  • [3] Coaching Research: who? what? where? when? why?
    Linley, P. Alex
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED COACHING & MENTORING, 2006, 4 (02): : 1 - 7
  • [4] Social media for pediatric research: what, who, why, and #?
    Nicolas A. Bamat
    Brett J. Manley
    Matthew W. Harer
    Damian Roland
    [J]. Pediatric Research, 2018, 84 : 597 - 599
  • [5] Conducting Ethics Research in Prison: Why, Who, and What?
    David M. Shaw
    Tenzin Wangmo
    Bernice S. Elger
    [J]. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2014, 11 : 275 - 278
  • [6] Conducting Ethics Research in Prison: Why, Who, and What?
    Shaw, David M.
    Wangmo, Tenzin
    Elger, Bernice S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY, 2014, 11 (03) : 275 - 278
  • [7] Recruiting older adults for medical research: The who, what and why
    Williams, C
    Williams, B
    Burgio, K
    Shuster, J
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 : 468 - 468
  • [8] Towards a research training curriculum: What, Why, How, Who?
    Erica McWilliam
    Parlo Singh
    [J]. The Australian Educational Researcher, 2002, 29 (3) : 3 - 18
  • [9] Barriers to Enrollment in Rheumatology Research: Who, What, Where, When, and Why?
    Sandhu, Vaneet K.
    Duro, Teodor
    Kamboj, Ajay
    Salto, Lorena
    Chiruvolu, Neha
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [10] Involving consumers in palliative care research: The who, what, why and how
    Collins, KA
    Ahmedzai, SH
    Button, S
    Harrison, S
    Ardron, D
    Ardon, J
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 15 (01) : S60 - S61