Deep learning algorithms to develop Flood susceptibility map in Data-Scarce and Ungauged River Basin in India

被引:16
|
作者
Saha, Sunil [1 ]
Gayen, Amiya [2 ]
Bayen, Bijoy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gour Bnaga, Dept Geog, Malda, W Bengal, India
[2] Univ Calcutta, Dept Geog, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
[3] Netaji Subhas Open Univ, Dept Geog, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
关键词
Convolution neural network; Benchmark machine learning models; Deep learning; flood susceptibility; Friedman and wilcoxon rank test; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; LAND-USE CHANGES; MULTILAYER PERCEPTRON; SPATIAL PREDICTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; HYBRID APPROACH; RANDOM-FOREST;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-022-02195-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Flood is considered the most extensive natural disaster around the globe. Kunur River, a riverine landscape of Rarh Bengal, was selected as the study area because this basin has undergone several floods. This research work applied deep learning and benchmark machine learning methods for preparing the flood susceptibility maps (FSMs) at a basin scale. For this work, sixteen flood controlling factors were applied. These predisposing factors were chosen based on field knowledge, previous researchs, and data availability. The FSMs were produced for the better palling and management of natural resources of Kunur River Basin, applying one deep learning model (DLM) includes convolution neural network (CNN) model and three benchmark machine learning methods (BMLMs) including multilayer perceptron (MLP), Bagging, and random forest (RF). The differences in prediction capacity between the models were assessed by applying the Friedman rank test and Wilcoxon test. Performance of the FSMs, evaluated through the precision, accuracy, AUC (area under the curve), and statistical measures revealed that CNN has the highest AUC values (0.934) followed by MLP (0.927), Bagging (0.897), and RF (0.900) respectively. The CNN model's prediction capacity is slightly better than Bagging, RF, and MLP models. Finally, we can conclude that the deep learning model is more robust than the benchmark MLMs (RF, MLP and Bagging) and CNN is excellent alternative for FSMs considering the used variables.
引用
收藏
页码:3295 / 3310
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning algorithms to develop Flood susceptibility map in Data-Scarce and Ungauged River Basin in India
    Sunil Saha
    Amiya Gayen
    Bijoy Bayen
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2022, 36 : 3295 - 3310
  • [2] Correction to: Deep learning algorithms to develop Flood susceptibility map in Data-Scarce and Ungauged River Basin in India
    Sunil Saha
    Amiya Gayen
    Bijoy Bayen
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2022, 36 : 4013 - 4015
  • [3] Deep learning algorithms to develop Flood susceptibility map in Data-Scarce and Ungauged River Basin in India (Mar, 10.1007/s00477-022-02195-1, 2022)
    Saha, Sunil
    Gayen, Amiya
    Bayen, Bijoy
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2022, 36 (11) : 4013 - 4015
  • [4] Flood damage models and flood damage factors in a data-scarce river basin, Nigeria
    Komolafe, Akinola Adesuji
    Ogundare, Adedeji Seun
    Olorunfemi, Idowu Ezekiel
    Oguntunde, Philip Gbenro
    ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2024,
  • [5] Uncertainty of drought information in a data-scarce tropical river basin
    Wambura, Frank Joseph
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2020, 32
  • [6] Improvement of streamflow simulation by combining physically hydrological model with deep learning methods in data-scarce glacial river basin
    Yang, Chengde
    Xu, Min
    Kang, Shichang
    Fu, Congsheng
    Hu, Didi
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 625
  • [7] Identification of Critical Flood Prone Areas in Data-Scarce and Ungauged Regions: A Comparison of Three Data Mining Models
    Omid Rahmati
    Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
    Water Resources Management, 2017, 31 : 1473 - 1487
  • [8] Identification of Critical Flood Prone Areas in Data-Scarce and Ungauged Regions: A Comparison of Three Data Mining Models
    Rahmati, Omid
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (05) : 1473 - 1487
  • [9] Flood risk index in data-scarce river basins using the AHP and GIS approach
    Preeti Ramkar
    Sanjaykumar M. Yadav
    Natural Hazards, 2021, 109 : 1119 - 1140
  • [10] Flood risk index in data-scarce river basins using the AHP and GIS approach
    Ramkar, Preeti
    Yadav, Sanjaykumar M.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 109 (01) : 1119 - 1140