Posttreatment assessment of response using FDG-PET/CT for patients treated with definitive radiation therapy for head and neck cancers

被引:139
|
作者
Andrade, Regiane S.
Heron, Dwight E.
Degirmenci, Berna
Filho, Pedro A. A.
Branstetter, Barton F.
Seethala, Raja R.
Ferris, Robert L.
Avril, Norbert
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Dept Radiol, Div Nucl Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Dept Radiol, Div Neuroradiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Dept Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
关键词
FDG-PET/CT; IMRT; head and neck cancer; treatment response;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The goal of this study was to evaluate coregistered [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for the detection of persistent disease after definitive radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Methods and Materials: Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT was performed in 28 patients on average 8 weeks (range, 4 to 15.7 weeks) after completing definitive radiation therapy. FDG-PET/CT was visually analyzed for the entire patient group and at two time points (4-8 and > 8 weeks) after treatment. The contrast-enhanced CT portion of PET/CT was separately analyzed blinded to the results of coregistered FDG-PET/CT and classified as negative or positive for residual locoregional disease. Pathologic findings and clinical follow-up served as the reference standard. Results: Follow-up data were available for all 28 patients (median, 17.6 months). Regarding the detection of residual disease, the overall sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT was 76.9% and 93.3%, respectively, compared with 92.3% and 46.7% for contrast-enhanced CT. The accuracy of FDG-PET/CT was 85.7%, compared with 67.9% for CT alone. All false-negative (n = 3) and false-positive (n = 1) FDG-PET/CT results occurred between 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. At 8 weeks or later after treatment, the specificity of CT was 28%, compared with 100% for FDG-PET/CT. Conclusion: The metabolic-anatomic information from coregistered FDG-PET/CT provided the most accurate assessment for treatment response when performed later than 8 weeks after the conclusion of radiation therapy. FDG-PET/CT excelled by a higher specificity and overall diagnostic performance than CT imaging alone. These. results support a potential clinical role of FDG-PET/CT in the early assessment of therapy response after definitive radiation therapy. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1315 / 1322
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Posttreatment assessment of response using FDG-PET/CT for patients treated with proton therapy for head and neck melanoma
    Nakagami, Y.
    Kuno, H.
    Kobayashi, T.
    Iwata, R.
    Hayashi, T.
    Satake, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 : S385 - S385
  • [2] The role of FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of response to radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wijovi, F.
    Angel, P.
    Claudia, M.
    Reina, N.
    Kurniawan, A.
    Kirana, D. H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S1613 - S1613
  • [3] DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF RESPONSE ASSESSMENT FDG-PET/CT IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD & NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH HIGH-PRECISION DEFINITIVE (CHEMO)RADIATION
    Gupta, T.
    Jain, S.
    Agarwal, J. P.
    Rangarajan, V.
    Ghosh-Laskar, S.
    Dinshaw, K.
    Purandare, N.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 94 : S27 - S28
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of response assessment FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with high-precision definitive (chemo)radiation
    Gupta, Tejpal
    Jain, Sandeep
    Agarwal, Jai Prakash
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    Purandare, Nilendu
    Ghosh-Laskar, Sarbani
    Dinshaw, Ketayun A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 97 (02) : 194 - 199
  • [5] Is FDG-PET/CT valuable in assessment of tumor response following radiation treatment for head and neck carcinomas?
    Wang, D.
    Schultz, C.
    Michel, M.
    Wong, S.
    Campbell, B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S421 - S421
  • [6] Analysis of the solitary pulmonary nodule on FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancers
    Song, H.
    Jang, G.
    Kwon, J. H.
    Kim, H. J.
    Kim, J. H.
    Choi, D. R.
    Jung, J. Y.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S757 - S757
  • [7] FDG-PET/CT for oral focus assessment in head and neck cancer patients
    Dominic Raphael Schwaninger
    Martin Hüllner
    Dominique Bichsel
    Barbara Giacomelli-Hiestand
    Nicole Selina Stutzmann
    Panagiotis Balermpas
    Silvio Valdec
    Bernd Stadlinger
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 4407 - 4418
  • [8] FDG-PET/CT for oral focus assessment in head and neck cancer patients
    Schwaninger, Dominic Raphael
    Hullner, Martin
    Bichsel, Dominique
    Giacomelli-Hiestand, Barbara
    Stutzmann, Nicole Selina
    Balermpas, Panagiotis
    Valdec, Silvio
    Stadlinger, Bernd
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (06) : 4407 - 4418
  • [9] Serial FDG-PET on patients with head and neck cancer: Implications for radiation therapy
    Hentschel, Maria
    Appold, Steffen
    Schreiber, Andreas
    Abramyuk, Andrij
    Abolmaali, Nasreddin
    Kotzerke, Joerg
    Baumann, Michael
    Zoephel, Klaus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 85 (09) : 796 - 804
  • [10] The Prognostic Value of Pretreatment FDG-PET Scans in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation
    Plichta, K. A.
    Sun, W.
    Anderson, C. M.
    Brown, B. J.
    Casavant, T. L.
    Braun, T. A.
    Buatti, J. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S538 - S538