Using implementation science to build intimate partner violence screening and referral capacity in a fracture clinic

Rationale, aims, and objectives Over the past two decades, research informing good clinical practices related to intimate partner violence (IPV) has been plentiful, yet partner violence screening remains challenging to translate into action. In spite of the documented efficacy of routine screening for women of reproductive age and the availability of validated screening instruments, many IPV screening programmes lack the components necessary for success. In Toronto, a multidisciplinary team of researchers and clinicians is using the tools of implementation science to scale up an evidence-based IPV screening and response programme in an urban orthopaedic clinic where prior screening attempts have been ineffective. Methods Using the Active Implementation Framework as a guide, researchers collected data across multiple sources to inform the first stage of implementation. Analysis focused on identifying the characteristics of the clinic that support or hinder implementation of new processes, evidence-based screening practices that fit with the clinic, and characteristics of a strong implementation team. Results Through this process, researchers and clinicians uncovered organizational strengths and weaknesses related to IPV screening that may not have been identified previously. The need to incorporate technology into our screening processes became apparent, as did the importance of shared communication and colearning between clinicians and researchers. Conclusions The benefits of investing in the preparatory phases of implementation are discussed. Without undertaking the process of gathering and analysing data, examining the factors that support effective and sustainable implementation, and investing in the creation of a strong implementation team, it is likely that decisions about our screening approaches would have resulted in a less-effective and sustainable process.