From Data to Causes III: Bayesian Priors for General Cross-Lagged Panel Models (GCLM)

被引:10
|
作者
Zyphur, Michael J. [1 ]
Hamaker, Ellen L. [2 ]
Tay, Louis [3 ]
Voelkle, Manuel [4 ]
Preacher, Kristopher J. [5 ]
Zhang, Zhen [6 ,7 ]
Allison, Paul D. [8 ]
Pierides, Dean C. [9 ]
Koval, Peter [10 ]
Diener, Edward F. [11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Management & Mkt, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Methodol & Stat, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Humboldt Univ, Dept Psychol, Berlin, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Dept Psychol & Human Dev, Berlin, Germany
[6] Southern Methodist Univ, Cox Sch Business, Dallas, TX USA
[7] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ USA
[8] Univ Penn, Dept Sociol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[9] Univ Stirling, Stirling Management Sch, Stirling, Scotland
[10] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[11] Univ Utah, Dept Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[12] Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, Gilmer Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
panel data model; Granger causality (VAR); Bayesian; shrinkage estimation; small-variance priors; INCOME;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.612251
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article describes some potential uses of Bayesian estimation for time-series and panel data models by incorporating information from prior probabilities (i.e., priors) in addition to observed data. Drawing on econometrics and other literatures we illustrate the use of informative "shrinkage" or "small variance" priors (including so-called "Minnesota priors") while extending prior work on the general cross-lagged panel model (GCLM). Using a panel dataset of national income and subjective well-being (SWB) we describe three key benefits of these priors. First, they shrink parameter estimates toward zero or toward each other for time-varying parameters, which lends additional support for an income -> SWB effect that is not supported with maximum likelihood (ML). This is useful because, second, these priors increase model parsimony and the stability of estimates (keeping them within more reasonable bounds) and thus improve out-of-sample predictions and interpretability, which means estimated effect should also be more trustworthy than under ML. Third, these priors allow estimating otherwise under-identified models under ML, allowing higher-order lagged effects and time-varying parameters that are otherwise impossible to estimate using observed data alone. In conclusion we note some of the responsibilities that come with the use of priors which, departing from typical commentaries on their scientific applications, we describe as involving reflection on how best to apply modeling tools to address matters of worldly concern.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From Data to Causes I: Building A General Cross-Lagged Panel Model (GCLM)
    Zyphur, Michael J.
    Allison, Paul D.
    Tay, Louis
    Voelkle, Manuel C.
    Preacher, Kristopher J.
    Zhang, Zhen
    Hamaker, Ellen L.
    Shamsollahi, Ali
    Pierides, Dean C.
    Koval, Peter
    Diener, Ed
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2020, 23 (04) : 651 - 687
  • [2] MEASURES OF DEPENDENCE FOR CROSS-LAGGED PANEL MODELS
    MAYER, LS
    CARROLL, SS
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1988, 17 (01) : 93 - 120
  • [4] CAUSES OF DEPRESSION IN COLLEGE-STUDENTS - A CROSS-LAGGED PANEL CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS
    RICH, AR
    SCOVEL, M
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1987, 60 (01) : 27 - 30
  • [5] Impact of violations of measurement invariance in cross-lagged panel mediation models
    Jie Xu
    Qian Zhang
    Yanyun Yang
    [J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2020, 52 : 2623 - 2645
  • [6] Cross-lagged Panel Mediation Models with Latent Constructs: Specification and Estimation
    Velasquez, Gertrudes
    Zhang, Qian
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2020, 55 (01) : 142 - 143
  • [7] Fitting Cross-Lagged Panel Models with the Residual Structural Equations Approach
    Tseng, Ming-Chi
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (05) : 923 - 931
  • [8] Impact of violations of measurement invariance in cross-lagged panel mediation models
    Xu, Jie
    Zhang, Qian
    Yang, Yanyun
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2020, 52 (06) : 2623 - 2645
  • [9] Feelings of not Mattering and Depressive Symptoms From a Temporal Perspective: A Comparison of the Cross-Lagged Panel Model and Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Etherson, Marianne E.
    Smith, Martin M.
    Hill, Andrew P.
    Flett, Gordon L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 40 (01) : 60 - 76
  • [10] Screen time and psychopathology: investigating directionality using cross-lagged panel models
    Patricia Bado
    Julia Schafer
    Andre R. Simioni
    Rodrigo A. Bressan
    Ary Gadelha
    Pedro M. Pan
    Eurípedes C. Miguel
    Luis A. Rohde
    Giovanni A. Salum
    [J]. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2022, 31 : 689 - 691