Community Factors in Differential Responses of Child Protective Services

被引:8
|
作者
McCallum, Karen [1 ]
Cheng, An-Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Nursing, 2464 Charlotte St, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
关键词
alternative response; child maltreatment; child protective service; child welfare; differential response; family relationships; multilevel model; UNITED-STATES; MALTREATMENT; SUBSTANTIATION; POVERTY; ABUSE; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/phn.12214
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIn response to criticisms of the traditional investigative model of child protective services (CPS) as adversarial, a Differential Response Model has emerged, with investigative and noninvestigative alternative response (AR) paths. The purpose of this study was to identify relationships of county-level community variables to response paths. Design and SampleSecondary analysis used data from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System linked to county-level variables from the American Community Survey. The final dataset included 62,499 cases and 98 counties from five states. MeasuresMultilevel modeling was used to analyze the binary outcome variable of CPS response path (AR, non-AR). Predictor variables included indicators at child, county, and state levels. ResultsCounty-level variables (housing vacancy, child poverty, unemployment, and households with public assistance) were significant predictors (p<.05) of CPS response path and accounted for12.30% of variability in the final three-level model. Individual variables (report source, maltreatmenttype, child age, race, and number of children in the report) were also significant predictors. ConclusionCounty-level community variables have significant relationships with CPS response paths and impact how CPS units respond to new referrals. Research is needed to apply advanced multilevel analytic procedures to more accurately model nested relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 117
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Differential Responses within Child Protective Services: A Longitudinal Examination
    Marshall, Sheila K.
    Charles, Grant
    Kendrick, Kristin
    Pakalniskiene, Vilmante
    [J]. CHILD WELFARE, 2010, 89 (03) : 57 - 77
  • [2] Ecological factors and screening in child protective services
    Wells, SJ
    Lyons, P
    Doueck, HJ
    Brown, CH
    Thomas, J
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2004, 26 (10) : 981 - 997
  • [3] Effect of Child Protective Services System Factors on Child Maltreatment Rereporting
    Bae, Hwa-ok
    Solomon, Phyllis L.
    Gelles, Richard J.
    White, Tammy
    [J]. CHILD WELFARE, 2010, 89 (03) : 33 - 55
  • [4] Timely and Needed Perspectives on Differential Response in Child Protective Services
    Ellett, Alberta J.
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2013, 23 (05) : 521 - 524
  • [5] Alternative responses to child protective services: Emerging issues and concerns
    English, DJ
    Wingard, T
    Marshall, D
    Orme, M
    Orme, A
    [J]. CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2000, 24 (03) : 375 - 388
  • [6] Community and informal social support for recipients of child protective services
    Manji, S
    Maiter, S
    Palmer, S
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2005, 27 (03) : 291 - 308
  • [7] CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
    Krasin, Lindiwe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROGRESSIVE HUMAN SERVICES, 2012, 23 (03) : 287 - 289
  • [8] A REVIEW OF RISK-FACTORS ASSESSED IN CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
    MCDONALD, T
    MARKS, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1991, 65 (01) : 112 - 132
  • [9] The Impact of Child, Family, and Child Protective Services Factors on Reports of Child Sexual Abuse Recurrence
    Sinanan, Allison N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE, 2011, 20 (06) : 657 - 676
  • [10] Portrait of sleep in preschoolers involved with Child Protective Services and from the community
    Touchette, Evelyne
    Rousseau, Michel
    Simard, Valerie
    St-Amand, Annick
    [J]. SLEEP MEDICINE, 2023, 110 : 166 - 171