Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Vancouver Type B2: Revision Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Locking Compression Plate

被引:35
|
作者
Baum, C. [1 ]
Leimbacher, M. [1 ]
Kriechling, P. [1 ]
Platz, A. [1 ]
Cadosch, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Triemli Hosp Zurich, Dept Gen Hand & Trauma Surg, Birmensdorferstr 497, CH-8063 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
total hip arthroplasty (THA); periprosthetic fractures; Vancouver B2; locking compression plate (LCP); femoral stem loosening; TOTAL HIP; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; FEMUR FRACTURES; FAILURE; RELIABILITY; MORTALITY; VALIDITY; MOBILITY; B1;
D O I
10.1177/2151459319876859
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Vancouver algorithm recommends revision arthroplasty (RA) for Vancouver type B2 (VTB2) fractures. However, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using locking compression plates (LCP) may be a valid and less invasive alternative treatment. Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and March 2017, we retrospectively recruited all patients treated with either ORIF with LCP or RA for VTB2 fractures in our clinic. All of the following were reviewed: the length of hospital stay, the operating time, the need for blood transfusions during and/or after surgery, implant-related and patient-related complications, need for revision surgery, and the radiological outcome. Additionally, the functional outcome was investigated. Results: Fifty-nine patients were recruited. Thirty-five (59.3%) patients underwent RA, while 24 (40.7%) patients received ORIF with LCP. The median surgical time was 137.50 minutes in the LCP group compared to 160.00 minutes in the RA group (P = .051). Three (12.5%) patients in the LCP group and 10 (28.6%) patients in the RA group experienced an implant-associated complication (P = .131). Patient-related complications occurred in 3 (12.5%) patients in the LCP group versus 6 (17.1%) patients in the RA group (P = .628). The mean preoperative Parker mobility score was 9 points in both groups and decreased in both groups to a mean of 5 points in the LCP and 7 points in the RA group. Discussion: Open reduction and internal fixation with LCP seems to be a less invasive procedure for VTB2 fractures in comparison to RA. It is a bone-sparing procedure that can be advantageous for further revision operations. Moreover, some fractures can only be anatomically reduced by ORIF with LCP, whereas for proximal fractures with a radiologically unambiguously loosened stem RA might be advantageous. Conclusion: In line with previously published studies, our data suggest that ORIF using LCP is a valid treatment option for VTB2 fractures.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures type Vancouver B2-Revision arthroplasty vs. open reduction and internal fixation with Locking Compression Plate: A retrospective single center study
    Baum, C.
    Leimbacher, M.
    Kriechling, P.
    Platz, P.
    Cadosch, D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 20 - 20
  • [2] Locking compression plate versus revision-prosthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty
    Joestl, Julian
    Hofbauer, Marcus
    Lang, Nikolaus
    Tiefenboeck, Thomas
    Hajdu, Stefan
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (04): : 939 - 943
  • [3] Treatment of Vancouver B2 Femur Fractures With Open Reduction Internal Fixation Versus Revision Arthroplasty
    Perry, Michael
    Rivera, John-Luke
    Wesolowski, Michael
    Eikani, Carlo
    Lack, William
    Cohen, Joseph
    Brown, Nicholas
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [4] REVISION ARTHROPLASTY VERSUS OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF VANCOUVER TYPE-B2 AND B3 PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES
    Haider, Thomas
    Hanna, Philip
    Mohamadi, Amin
    Merchan, Nelson
    McNichol, Megan
    Wixted, John J.
    Appleton, Paul T.
    Nazarian, Ara
    von Keudell, Arvind G.
    Rodriguez, Edward K.
    [J]. JBJS REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [5] Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate
    Spina M.
    Scalvi A.
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2018, 28 (6) : 1133 - 1142
  • [6] Open reduction and Internal Fixation Might be a Valuable Alternative to Stem Revision in Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
    Flury, Andreas
    Hasler, Julian
    Finsterwald, Michael
    Baumgartner, Bodo
    Dimitriou, Dimitris
    Helmy, Nader
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2019, 149 : 12S - 12S
  • [7] Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-b1 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Buttaro, M. A.
    Farfalli, G.
    Nunez, M. Paredes
    Comba, F.
    Piccaluga, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (09): : 1964 - 1969
  • [8] Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty
    Laurer, Helmut L.
    Wutzler, Sebastian
    Possner, Susann
    Geiger, Emanuel V.
    El Saman, Andre
    Marzi, Ingo
    Frank, Johannes
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2011, 131 (07) : 983 - 989
  • [9] Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty
    Helmut L. Laurer
    Sebastian Wutzler
    Susann Possner
    Emanuel V. Geiger
    André El Saman
    Ingo Marzi
    Johannes Frank
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2011, 131 : 983 - 989
  • [10] Management of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures, Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lewis, Daniel P.
    Tarrant, Seth M.
    Cornford, Lachlan
    Balogh, Zsolt J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2022, 36 (01) : 7 - 16