Development and External Validation of a Novel Nomogram to Predict Side-specific Extraprostatic Extension in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

被引:36
|
作者
Soeterik, Timo F. W. [1 ,2 ]
van Melick, Harm H. E. [2 ]
Dijksman, Lea M. [3 ]
Kusters-Vandevelde, Heidi [4 ]
Stomps, Saskia [5 ]
Schoots, Ivo G. [6 ]
Biesma, Douwe H. [1 ]
Witjes, J. A. [7 ]
Van Basten, Jean-Paul A. [8 ]
机构
[1] Santeon Grp, Dept Value Based Healthcare, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol, Nieuwegein Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Value Based Healthcare, Nieuwegein Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Pathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Hosp Grp Twente, Dept Urol, Hengelo Almelo, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[8] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Urol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Nomogram; Extraprostatic extension; Radical prostatectomy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Staging; EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION; RISK; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; BIOPSY; TESLA;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Prediction of side-specific extraprostatic extension (EPE) is crucial in selecting patients for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP). Objective: To develop and externally validate nomograms including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) information to predict side-specific EPE. Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective analysis of 1870 consecutive prostate cancer patients who underwent robot-assisted RP from 2014 to 2018 at three institutions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Four multivariable logistic regression models were established, including combinations of patient-based and side-specific variables: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, highest ipsilateral International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) biopsy grade, ipsilateral percentage of positive cores on systematic biopsy, and side-specific clinical stage assessed by both digital rectal examination and mpMRI. Discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]), calibration, and net benefit of these models were assessed in the development cohort and two external validation cohorts. Results and limitations: On external validation, AUCs of the four models ranged from 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.88) to 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.90) in cohort 1 and from 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.87) to 0.78 (95% CI 0.64-0.88) in cohort 2. The three models including mpMRI staging information resulted in relatively higher AUCs compared with the model without mpMRI information. No major differences between the four models regarding net benefit were established. The model based on PSA density, ISUP grade, and mpMRI T stage was superior in terms of calibration. Using this model with a cut-off of 20%, 1980/2908 (68%) prostatic lobes without EPE would be found eligible for nerve sparing, whereas nonnerve sparing would be advised in 642/832 (77%) lobes with EPE. Conclusions: Our analysis resulted in a simple and robust nomogram for the prediction of side-specific EPE, which should be used to select patients for nerve-sparing RP. Patient summary: We developed a prediction model that can be used to assess accurately the likelihood of tumour extension outside the prostate. This tool can guide patient selection for safe nerve-sparing surgery. (c) 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 337
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] External validation of the Martini nomogram for prediction of side-specific extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Soeterik, Timo F. W.
    van Melick, Harm H. E.
    Dijksman, Lea M.
    Kusters-Vandevelde, Heidi V. N.
    Biesma, Douwe H.
    Witjes, J. A.
    van Basten, Jean-Paul A.
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (05) : 372 - 378
  • [2] External Validation of Models for Prediction of Side-specific Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Diamand, Romain
    Roche, Jean -Baptiste
    Lievore, Elena
    Lacetera, Vito
    Chiacchio, Giuseppe
    Beatrici, Valerio
    Mastroianni, Riccardo
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Windisch, Olivier
    Benamran, Daniel
    Favre, Martina Martins
    Fourcade, Alexandre
    Nguyen, Truong An
    Fournier, Georges
    Fiard, Gaelle
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Roumeguere, Thierry
    Peltier, Alexandre
    Albisinni, Simone
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (02): : 309 - 316
  • [3] External Validation of a Prediction Model for Side-specific Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Veerman, Hans
    Heymans, Martijn W.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 37 : 50 - 52
  • [4] ADDITIONAL VALUE OF A NOMOGRAM TO PREDICT THE SIDE-SPECIFIC EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER SCHEDULED FOR RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Soeterik, Timo
    van Melick, Harm
    Dijksman, Lea
    Kusters, Heidi
    Stomps, Saskia
    Biesma, Douwe
    Witjes, Fred
    van Basten, Jean-Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E112 - E112
  • [5] External validation of a nomogram for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension at robotic radical prostatectomy
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    Gallina, Andrea
    Hutterer, Georg C.
    Walz, Jochen
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    Valiquette, Luc
    Gofrit, Ofer N.
    Orvieto, Marcelo A.
    Taxy, Jerome B.
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (11) : 1345 - 1351
  • [6] Validation of a nomogram for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy
    Steuber, T
    Graefen, M
    Chun, KHF
    Haese, A
    Schlomm, T
    Erbersdobler, A
    Huland, H
    Karakiewicz, PI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 507 - 507
  • [7] A side-specific nomogram for extraprostatic extension may reduce the positive surgical margin rate in radical prostatectomy
    Heetman, Joris G.
    Soeterik, Timo F. W.
    Wever, Lieke
    Meyer, Aswin R.
    Nuininga, Jody E.
    van Soest, Robert J.
    van Melick, Harm H. E.
    Van Basten, Jean-Paul P. A.
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (12) : 2919 - 2924
  • [8] A side-specific nomogram for extraprostatic extension may reduce the positive surgical margin rate in radical prostatectomy
    Joris G. Heetman
    Timo F. W. Soeterik
    Lieke Wever
    Aswin R. Meyer
    Jody E. Nuininga
    Robert J. van Soest
    Harm H. E. van Melick
    Jean-Paul P. A. van Basten
    Roderick C. N. van den Bergh
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2919 - 2924
  • [9] Apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluation of side-specific extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: Development and external validation of a nomogram of clinical use
    Giganti, Francesco
    Coppola, Andrea
    Ambrosi, Alessandro
    Ravelli, Silvia
    Esposito, Antonio
    Freschi, Massimo
    Briganti, Alberto
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Salonia, Andrea
    Gallina, Andrea
    Deho, Federico
    Cardone, Gianpiero
    Balconi, Giuseppe
    Gaboardi, Franco
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Del Maschio, Alessandro
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (07) : 291.e9 - 291.e17
  • [10] Explainable artificial intelligence to predict the risk of side-specific extraprostatic extension in pre-prostatectomy patients
    Kwong, Jethro C. C.
    Khondker, Adree
    Tran, Christopher
    Evans, Emily
    Cozma, Adrian, I
    Javidan, Ashkan
    Ali, Amna
    Jamal, Munir
    Short, Thomas
    Papanikolaou, Frank
    Srigley, John R.
    Fine, Benjamin
    Feifer, Andrew
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (06): : 213 - 221