Development and validation of optimal cut-off value in inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference for prediction of cardiovascular events

被引:12
|
作者
Hirono, Akira [1 ]
Kusunose, Kenya [1 ]
Kageyama, Norihito [2 ]
Sumitomo, Masayuki [3 ]
Abe, Masahiro [4 ]
Fujinaga, Hiroyuki [5 ]
Sata, Masataka [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokushima Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, 2-50-1 Kuramoto, Tokushima 7700003, Japan
[2] Tokushima Prefectural Miyoshi Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Tokushima, Japan
[3] Tokushima Prefectural Miyoshi Hosp, Dept Surg, Tokushima, Japan
[4] Univ Tokushima, Grad Sch, Inst Biomed Sci, Dept Hematol Endocrinol & Metab, Tokushima, Japan
[5] Tokushima Prefectural Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Tokushima, Japan
关键词
Inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference; Cardiovascular risk; Optimal cut-off value; PULSE-WAVE VELOCITY; RISK-FACTORS; ALL-CAUSE; DISEASE; MORTALITY; ASSOCIATION; METAANALYSIS; ATHEROSCLEROSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.06.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: An inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (IAD) is associated with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the optimal cut-off value of IAD as a predictor of major adverse cardiac events in patients with arteriosclerosis risk factors. Methods: From 2009 to 2014,1076 patients who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor were included in the analysis. We defined 700 randomly selected patients as a development cohort to confirm that IAD was the predictor of cardiovascular events and to determine optimal cut-off value of IAD. Next, we validated outcomes in the remaining 376 patients as a validation cohort. The blood pressure (BP) of both arms measurements were done simultaneously using the ankle-brachial blood pressure index (ABI) form of automatic device. The primary endpoint was the cardiovascular event and secondary endpoint was the all-cause mortality. Results: During a median period of 2.8 years, 143 patients reached the primary endpoint in the development cohort. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, IAD was the strong predictor of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.05, p = 0.005). The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that 5 mmHg was the optimal cut-off point of IAD to predict cardiovascular events (p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, the presence of a large IAD (IAD >= 5 mmHg) was significantly associated with the primary endpoint (p = 0.021). Conclusions: IAD is significantly associated with future cardiovascular events in patients with arteriosclerosis risk factors. The optimal cut-off value of IAD is 5 mmHg. (C) 2017 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 30
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMBINED EFFECT OF INTER-ARM SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCE AND CAROTID ARTERY PLAQUE ON CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS
    Yun, Cuijuan
    Xin, Qian
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2023, 41 : E195 - E195
  • [2] INTER-ARM DIFFERENCE IN SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE AND ARTERIAL STIFFNESS
    Lee, J. H.
    Hwang, K.
    Cho, M.
    Rhee, M.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 : E283 - E283
  • [3] The Effect Of Exercise On Inter-arm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference
    Holmstrup, Michael E.
    Clarke, Melanie M.
    Conner, Cailin R.
    Lin, Yen-Kuan
    Jensen, Brock T.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 901 - 901
  • [4] Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Difference
    Bursztyn, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2013, 15 (11): : 774 - 775
  • [5] Inter-arm blood pressure difference, when is it a useful risk marker for cardiovascular events?
    Clark, Christopher E.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2022, 36 (02) : 117 - 119
  • [6] Exercise Duration Augments Inter-Arm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference
    Allen, Sarah R.
    Clarke, Melanie M.
    Walsh, Maureen A.
    Komoroski, Daniel L.
    Jensen, Brock T.
    Holmstrup, Michael E.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2018, 50 (05): : 280 - 281
  • [7] Inter-arm blood pressure difference, when is it a useful risk marker for cardiovascular events?
    Christopher E. Clark
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2022, 36 : 117 - 119
  • [8] Inter-Arm Difference in Systolic Blood Pressure-"The Plot Stiffens"-
    Giles, Thomas D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2013, 15 (12): : 878 - 879
  • [9] Inter-arm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference in Physically Active, Adult Subjects
    Neunhäuserer D.
    Gasperetti A.
    Ortolan S.
    Battista F.
    Pettenella P.
    Zaccaria M.
    Bergamin M.
    Ermolao A.
    High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, 2018, 25 (3) : 303 - 307
  • [10] Inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference is a useful predictor for clinical outcome
    Cao, Kaiwu
    Su, Hai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 198 : 81 - 82