Ziprasidone Augmentation of Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: Efficacy Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
被引:36
|
作者:
Papakostas, George I.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Trials Network & Inst, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USAMassachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Trials Network & Inst, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Papakostas, George I.
[1
]
Fava, Maurizio
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Trials Network & Inst, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Fava, Maurizio
Baer, Lee
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Trials Network & Inst, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Baer, Lee
Swee, Michaela B.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Trials Network & Inst, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Swee, Michaela B.
Jaeger, Adrienne
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Trials Network & Inst, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Jaeger, Adrienne
Bobo, William V.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Trials Network & Inst, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Bobo, William V.
Shelton, Richard C.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Trials Network & Inst, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Shelton, Richard C.
机构:
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Trials Network & Inst, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Objective: The authors sought to test the efficacy of adjunctive ziprasidone in adults with nonpsychotic unipolar major depression experiencing persistent symptoms after 8 weeks of open-label treatment with escitalopram. Method: This was an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted at three academc medical centers. Participants were 139 outpatients with persistent symptoms of major depression after an 8-week open-label trial of escitalopram (phase 1), randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adjunctive ziprasidone (escitalopram plus ziprasidone, N=71) or adjunctive placebo (escitalopram plus placebo, N=68), with 8 weekly follow-up assessments. The primary outcome measure was clinical response, defined as a reduction of at least 50% in score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The Hamilton Anxiety Rating scale (HAM-A) and Visual Analog Scale for Pain were defined a priori as key secondary outcome measures. Results: Rates of clinical response (35.2% compared with 20.5%) and mean improvement in HAM-D total scores (-6.4 [SD=6.4] compared with -3.3 [SD=6.2]) were significantly greater for the escitalopram plus ziprasidone group. Several secondary measures of antidepressant efficacy also favored adjunctive ziprasidone. The escitalopram plus ziprasidone group also showed significantly greater improvement on HAM-A score but not on Visual Analog Scale for Pain score. Ten (14%) patients in the escitalopram plus ziprasidone group discontinued treatment because of intolerance, compared with none in the escitalopram plus placebo group. Conclusions: Ziprasidone as an adjunct to escitalopram demonstrated antidepressant efficacy in adult patients with major depressive disorder experiencing persistent symptoms after 8 weeks of open-label treatment with escitalopram.