Conventional and advanced exergoeconomic analyses of geothermal district heating systems

被引:49
|
作者
Kecebas, Ali [1 ]
Hepbasli, Arif [2 ]
机构
[1] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Fac Technol, Dept Energy Syst Engn, TR-48000 Mugla, Turkey
[2] Yasar Univ, Dept Energy Syst Engn, Fac Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Geothermal energy; District heating system; Advanced exergoeconomic analysis; Exergy destruction cost; Investment cost; Splitting process; Specific exergy costing; ADVANCED EXERGETIC ANALYSES; COSTS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.011
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The present study deals with analyzing, assessing and comparing conventional and advanced exergoeconomic analyses to identify the direction and potential for energy savings of a geothermal district heating system in future conditions/projections. As a real case study, the Afyon geothermal district heating system in Afyonkarahisar, Turkey, is considered while its actual operational thermal data on 8 February 2011 are utilized in the analysis, which is based on the specific exergy costing method. In this study for the first time, based on the concepts of avoidable/unavoidable and endogenous/exogenous parts, cost rates associated with both exergy destruction and capital investment of the geothermal district heating system are determined first, and the obtained results are then evaluated. The results indicate that the internal design changes play a more essential role in determining the cost of each component. The cost rate of unavoidable part within the components of the system is lower than that of the avoidable one. For the overall system, the value for the conventional exergoeconomic factor is determined to be 5.53% while that for the modified one is calculated to be 9.49%. As a result, the advanced exergoeconomic analysis makes more sense given the additional information in splitting process of the components. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 441
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An economic comparison and evaluation of two geothermal district heating systems for advanced exergoeconomic analysis
    Kecebas, Pinar
    Gokgedik, Harun
    Alkan, Mehmet Ali
    Kecebas, Ali
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 84 : 471 - 480
  • [2] Exergoeconomic analysis of geothermal district heating systems: A case study
    Ozgener, Leyla
    Hepbasli, Arif
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 27 (8-9) : 1303 - 1310
  • [3] A comparative study on conventional and advanced exergetic analyses of geothermal district heating systems based on actual operational data
    Hepbasli, Arif
    Kecebas, Ali
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 61 : 193 - 201
  • [4] Effect of reference state on the exergoeconomic evaluation of geothermal district heating systems
    Kecebas, Ali
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 25 : 462 - 469
  • [5] A review on energetic, exergetic and exergoeconomic aspects of geothermal district heating systems (GDHSs)
    Hepbasli, Arif
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 51 (10) : 2041 - 2061
  • [6] EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEMS
    Verda, Vittorio
    Fausone, Serena
    ES2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, VOL 1, 2009, : 377 - 383
  • [7] Monitoring of energy exergy efficiencies and exergoeconomic parameters of geothermal district heating systems (GDHSs)
    Ozgener, Leyla
    Ozgener, Onder
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (09) : 1704 - 1711
  • [8] Exergoeconomic analysis of the Gonen geothermal district heating system for buildings
    Oktay, Z.
    Dincer, I.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (02) : 154 - 163
  • [9] Exergoeconomic analysis of district heating system boosted by the geothermal heat pump
    Arat, Halit
    Arslan, Oguz
    ENERGY, 2017, 119 : 1159 - 1170
  • [10] Exergoeconomic evaluation on the optimum heating circuit system of Simav geothermal district heating system
    Arslan, Oguz
    Ozgur, M. Arif
    Kose, Ramazan
    Tugcu, Abtullah
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (12) : 1325 - 1333