After safety, what is the goal of child welfare services: permanency, family continuity or social benefit?

被引:23
|
作者
Barth, RP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Social Work, Jordan Inst Families, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
child welfare; foster care; family continuity; adoption; social benefits; kinship care; permanency planning;
D O I
10.1111/1468-2397.00091
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Child welfare services have multiple goals, including child protection, family continuity, and achievement of legal permanency so children can end their involvement with child welfare services and have a lifetime family. These goals are not all achievable to the same extent in all cases. American child welfare policy has, in the last: few: years, become more definitive about the priority of child protection above family preservation. Now, situations which involve safety risks that are too great do not require any efforts at reunifying children to their biological homes, Less clear in American child welfare policy and practice is the value to be placed on other factors - particularly when a child cannot return home and will need an alternative adoptive family, Practitioners often emphasize family continuity - that is, the opportunity to maintain contact with the biological parent and extended family members - as a key decision making consideration. Yet, family continuity does not necessarily predict a successful transition to adulthood that is healthy for children or provides social benefits to the community. This paper explores the rationale for expanding child welfare decision making criteria by adding longer-term outcomes and the likelihood that children will eventually generate social benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 252
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OUTCOMES OF CHILD-WELFARE SERVICES UNDER PERMANENCY PLANNING
    BARTH, RP
    BERRY, M
    [J]. SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1987, 61 (01) : 71 - 90
  • [2] From child abuse to permanency planning: Child welfare services pathways and placements
    Zuravin, SJ
    Barth, RP
    Courtney, M
    Berrick, JD
    Albert, V
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 1996, 18 (03) : 281 - 284
  • [3] Association of caregiver social support with the safety, permanency, and well-being of children in child welfare
    Rajendran, Khushmand
    Smith, Brenda D.
    Videka, Lynn
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2015, 48 : 150 - 158
  • [4] The Influence of Family Reunification Services on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Permanency Outcomes for Children in the Child Welfare System
    Osterling, Kathy Lemon
    Lee, Peter Allen
    Hines, Alice H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC CHILD WELFARE, 2012, 6 (03) : 330 - 354
  • [5] Trauma-responsive child welfare services: A mixed methods study assessing safety, stability, and permanency
    Topitzes, James
    Grove, Timothy
    Meyer, Erika E.
    Pangratz, Stacey M.
    Sprague, Caitlin M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2019, 16 (03): : 291 - 312
  • [6] Impact of a family treatment court on child permanency and safety
    Mersky, Joshua P.
    Lee, ChienTi Plummer
    Liu, Xiyao
    Janczewski, Colleen E.
    [J]. CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2023, 146
  • [7] Predicting use of child welfare services after intensive family preservation services
    Unrau, YA
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 1997, 7 (02) : 202 - 215
  • [8] Safety, Family, Permanency, and Child Well-Being: What We Can Learn from Children
    Fox, Adair
    Berrick, Jill Duerr
    Frasch, Karie
    [J]. CHILD WELFARE, 2008, 87 (01) : 63 - 90
  • [9] Children with disabilities in child and family welfare services
    Mitchell, Gaye
    [J]. CHILDREN AUSTRALIA, 2014, 39 (02) : 107 - 118
  • [10] The Missing Link to Child Safety, Permanency, and Well-Being: Addressing Substance Misuse in Child Welfare
    Traube, Dorian E.
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH, 2012, 36 (02) : 83 - 87