Alternative inclusive approaches for improving climate information services and decision-making in Harare, Zimbabwe

被引:2
|
作者
Mubaya, Chipo Plaxedes [1 ]
Ndebele-Murisa, Mzime Regina [1 ,2 ]
Mamombe, Rudo [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinhoyi Univ Technol, Dept Freshwater & Fishery Sci, Int Collaborat Off, P Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe
[2] START Int, 1440 G St Nw, Washington, DC 20005 USA
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Climate information services (CIS); Decision-making; Harare; Southern Africa; Stakeholder engagement; Urban development; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100691
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
City-scale climate information is needed to inform policy, decision-making and climate action in the context of development agendas like Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Sendai Framework of Disaster Risk Reduction, New Urban Agenda and the Paris Agreement. Traditional approaches in climate services are often top-down and inadequate in meeting the needs of stakeholders in urban areas like African cities. To enhance the provision of relevant climate information, it is important to understand the context of the urban environment in question and decision-making processes. Researchers from the FRACTAL project used participatory, transdisciplinary co-production approaches to understand the context of Harare and to investigate perceptions and values that underpin decision-making in the water sector. These were tied to historical trends in climate and hydrological flows as well as narratives of future climate and hydrological scenarios to draw timely, relevant information for policy, and practice implementation and for building resilience in the city. Lessons learnt, which are applicable to similar African cities, show the importance of understanding decision-making in providing a context to build on for distilling, improving and mainstreaming climate information services and that engagement processes are useful in building sustained working relationships and trust. (198 words).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving the use of climate information in decision-making
    Chris D. Hewitt
    Roger C. Stone
    Andrew B. Tait
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7 : 614 - 616
  • [2] Improving the use of climate information in decision-making
    Hewitt, Chris D.
    Stone, Roger C.
    Tait, Andrew B.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 7 (09) : 614 - 616
  • [3] The Effect of Relationships on Decision-Making Processes of Women in Harare, Zimbabwe
    Nyika, Aceme
    Wassenaar, Douglas Richard
    Mamotte, Nicole
    [J]. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 19 (03) : 184 - 200
  • [4] INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING IN HUMAN SERVICES
    HOLLAND, TP
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION IN MENTAL HEALTH, 1976, 4 (01): : 26 - 35
  • [6] Approaches to improving valuation decision-making: a review of the literature
    Liman, Hassan Shuaibu
    Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed
    Levy, Deborah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPERTY INVESTMENT & FINANCE, 2024,
  • [7] Rights-based approaches to climate decision-making
    Jodoin, Sebastien
    Savaresi, Annalisa
    Wewerinke-Singh, Margaretha
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 52 : 45 - 53
  • [8] Climate Services Transformed: Decision-Making Practice for the Coast in a Changing Climate
    Lawrence, Judy
    Stephens, Scott
    Blackett, Paula
    Bell, Robert G.
    Priestley, Rebecca
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [9] ISSUES IN ECOSYSTEM VALUATION - IMPROVING INFORMATION FOR DECISION-MAKING
    BINGHAM, G
    BISHOP, R
    BRODY, M
    BROMLEY, D
    CLARK, E
    COOPER, W
    COSTANZA, R
    HALE, T
    HAYDEN, G
    KELLERT, S
    NORGAARD, R
    NORTON, B
    PAYNE, J
    RUSSELL, C
    SUTER, G
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 14 (02) : 73 - 90
  • [10] Colorado River Basin: Governance, Decision-Making, and Alternative Approaches
    Juricich, Rich
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 148 (06)