Interpretation and use of evidence in state policymaking: a qualitative analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Apollonio, Dorie E. [1 ]
Bero, Lisa A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Clin Pharm, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; STORIES; ENTREPRENEURSHIP;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012738
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Researchers advocating for evidence-informed policy have attempted to encourage policymakers to develop a greater understanding of research and researchers to develop a better understanding of the policymaking process. Our aim was to apply findings drawn from studies of the policymaking process, specifically the theory of policy windows, to identify strategies used to integrate evidence into policymaking and points in the policymaking process where evidence was more or less relevant. Methods: Our observational study relied on interviews conducted with 24 policymakers from the USA who had been trained to interpret scientific research in multiple iterations of an evidence-based workshop. Participants were asked to describe cases where they had been involved in making health policy and to provide examples in which research was used, either successfully or unsuccessfully. Interviews were transcribed, independently coded by multiple members of the study team and analysed for content using key words, concepts identified by participants and concepts arising from review of the texts. Results: Our results suggest that policymakers who focused on health issues used multiple strategies to encourage evidence-informed policymaking. The respondents used a strict definition of what constituted evidence, and relied on their experience with research to discourage the use of less rigorous research. Their experience suggested that evidence was less useful in identifying problems, encouraging political action or ensuring feasibility and more useful in developing policy alternatives. Conclusions: Past research has suggested multiple strategies to increase the use of evidence in policymaking, including the development of rapid-response research and policy-oriented summaries of data. Our findings suggest that these strategies may be most relevant to the policymaking stream, which develops policy alternatives. In addition, we identify several strategies that policymakers and researchers can apply to encourage evidence-informed policymaking.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of Research Evidence in State Policymaking for Childhood Obesity Prevention in Minnesota
    Gollust, Sarah E.
    Kite, Hanna A.
    Benning, Sara J.
    Callanan, Rachel A.
    Weisman, Susan R.
    Nanney, Marilyn S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (10) : 1894 - 1900
  • [2] Strategic use of evidence in state-level policymaking: matching evidence type to legislative stage
    Jennifer E. Mosley
    Katherine Gibson
    [J]. Policy Sciences, 2017, 50 : 697 - 719
  • [3] Use of research evidence in state health policymaking: Menu labeling policy in California
    Payan, Denise D.
    Lewis, LaVonna B.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2019, 16
  • [4] Strategic use of evidence in state-level policymaking: matching evidence type to legislative stage
    Mosley, Jennifer E.
    Gibson, Katherine
    [J]. POLICY SCIENCES, 2017, 50 (04) : 697 - 719
  • [5] FACILITATORS AND BARRIERS TO THE USE OF BEST EVIDENCE IN POLICYMAKING
    Young, Taryn
    [J]. CURRENT ALLERGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 25 (02) : 94 - 95
  • [6] A document analysis methodology for tracking and assessing use of research evidence in health policymaking
    Yanovitzky, Itzhak
    Weber, Matthew
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (SUPPL 1):
  • [7] Partisanship, Anecdotes, and Evidence in State Legislators' Policymaking on Abortion
    Woodruff, K.
    Roberts, S. C. M.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 99 (05) : 319 - 320
  • [8] Promoting the use of evidence in health policymaking in the ECOWAS region: the development and contextualization of an evidence-based policymaking guidance
    Uneke, Chigozie Jesse
    Sombie, Issiaka
    Johnson, Ermel
    Uneke, Bilikis Iyabo
    Okolo, Stanley
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2020, 16 (01)
  • [9] The myth of 'evidence-based policymaking' in a decentred state
    Cairney, Paul
    [J]. PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 37 (01): : 46 - 66
  • [10] Promoting the use of evidence in health policymaking in the ECOWAS region: the development and contextualization of an evidence-based policymaking guidance
    Chigozie Jesse Uneke
    Issiaka Sombie
    Ermel Johnson
    Bilikis Iyabo Uneke
    Stanley Okolo
    [J]. Globalization and Health, 16