Letrozole Versus Clomiphene for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome EDITORIAL COMMENT

被引:0
|
作者
Legro, Richard S. [1 ]
Brzyski, Robert G. [2 ]
Diamond, Michael P. [3 ,4 ]
Coutifaris, Christos [5 ]
Schlaff, William D. [6 ]
Casson, Peter [7 ]
Christman, Gregory M. [8 ]
Huang, Hao [9 ]
Yan, Qingshang [9 ]
Alvero, Ruben [6 ]
Haisenleder, Daniel J. [10 ]
Barnhart, Kurt T. [5 ]
Bates, G. Wright [11 ]
Usadi, Rebecca [12 ]
Lucidi, Scott [13 ]
Baker, Valerie [14 ]
Trussell, J. C. [15 ]
Krawetz, Stephen A. [4 ]
Snyder, Peter [5 ]
Ohl, Dana [8 ]
Santoro, Nanette [6 ]
Eisenberg, Esther [16 ]
Zhang, Heping [9 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[3] Georgia Regents Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Augusta, GA USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Aurora, CO USA
[7] Univ Vermont, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Burlington, VT USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[9] Yale Univ, Dept Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
[10] Univ Virginia, Ctr Res Reprod, Ligand Core Lab, Charlottesville, VA USA
[11] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[12] Carolinas Med Ctr, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
[13] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[14] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[15] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Onondaga, NY USA
[16] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Fertil & Infertil Branch, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ogx.0000456355.64379.77
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The most common cause of female infertility is polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), which occurs in 5% to 10% of reproductive-age women. Clomiphene citrate has been used as a fertility agent for decades and is the current first-line infertility treatment in women with PCOS. However, this selective estrogen-receptor modulator has a number of drawbacks. In addition to its overall poor efficacy, clomiphene is associated with a high multiple-pregnancy rate compared with unassisted conception and an undesirable adverse effect profile, including changes in mood and hot flushes. More effective and safer treatments for infertility are needed. Several studies have shown that aromatase inhibitors, which block estrogen synthesis, increase pregnancy rates. Potential advantages of letrozole and other aromatase inhibitors over clomiphene include a more physiologic stimulation of the endometrium, lower multiple-pregnancy rates, and a better adverse effect profile with fewer vasomotor and mood symptoms. However, a concern for letrozole is its potential for fetal teratogenicity. The aim of this double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial was to determine whether letrozole is a better fertility agent than clomiphene in women with PCOS and has similar or better safety profile. Subjects were infertile women with PCOS between 18 and 40 years old who wished to become pregnant. A total of 750 women were randomized to receive letrozole or clomiphene for up to 5 treatment cycles. Patient visits determined ovulation and pregnancy and were followed by tracking of pregnancies. Modified Rotterdam criteria were used to diagnose PCOS. All participants had at least 1 patent fallopian tube, a normal uterine cavity, and a male partner with a sperm concentration of at least 14 million per milliliter. The women and their male partners agreed to have regular intercourse. No placebo was used because the 2 drugs were given similarly, with the same duration of treatment and stepwise increase in dose. The primary study outcome was live birth during the treatment period. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. Women in the letrozole group had more cumulative live births than did those in the clomiphene group (27.5% [103/374] vs 19.1% [72/376]; the rate ratio for live births was 1.44, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.10 to 1.87, P = 0.007. Although there was no difference between groups in overall congenital anomalies, 4 major congenital anomalies were found in the letrozole group versus 1 in the clomiphene group; however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.65). Letrozole was also associated with higher cumulative ovulation rates (61.7% [834 of 1352 treatment cycles] vs 48.3% [688 of 1425 treatment cycles], P < 0.001). No significant between-group differences were found in rates of pregnancy loss after conception (31.8% [49 of 154 pregnancies] in the letrozole group vs 29.1% [30 of 103 pregnancies] in the clomiphene group) or in rates of twin pregnancy (3.4% and 7.4%, respectively). There was a higher incidence of hot flushes in the clomiphene group and a higher incidence of fatigue and dizziness in the letrozole group. Rates of other adverse events in the 2 groups were similar. These data show that letrozole is a more effective fertility treatment than clomiphene in women with PCOS. Further studies with larger numbers of infants are needed to clarify the safety and teratogenic risks of letrozole.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 601
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Letrozole versus Clomiphene for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
    Legro, Richard S.
    Brzyski, Robert G.
    Diamond, Michael P.
    Coutifaris, Christos
    Schlaff, William D.
    Casson, Peter
    Christman, Gregory M.
    Huang, Hao
    Yan, Qingshang
    Alvero, Ruben
    Haisenleder, Daniel J.
    Barnhart, Kurt T.
    Bates, G. Wright
    Usadi, Rebecca
    Lucidi, Scott
    Baker, Valerie
    Trussell, J. C.
    Krawetz, Stephen A.
    Snyder, Peter
    Ohl, Dana
    Santoro, Nanette
    Eisenberg, Esther
    Zhang, Heping
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (02): : 119 - 129
  • [2] Letrozole or Clomiphene for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
    Bronson, Richard
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (15): : 1462 - 1462
  • [3] Letrozole or Clomiphene for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome REPLY
    Legro, Richard S.
    Zhang, Heping
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (15): : 1463 - 1464
  • [4] Letrozole versus Clomiphene for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (vol 371, pg 119, 2014)
    Legro, R. S.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (15): : 1465 - 1465
  • [5] Combined letrozole and clomiphene versus letrozole and clomiphene alone in infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome
    Hajishafiha, Masomeh
    Dehghan, Meisam
    Kiarang, Nazila
    Sadegh-Asadi, Nahideh
    Shayegh, Seyed Navid
    Ghasemi-Rad, Mohammad
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2013, 7 : 1427 - 1431
  • [6] Clinical efficacy of letrozole and clomiphene in the treatment of infertility due to polycystic ovary syndrome
    Nie, Huilong
    Zhang, Lin
    Luo, Xiping
    [J]. PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2024, 66 (01) : 86 - 88
  • [7] Clinical efficacy of letrozole and clomiphene in the treatment of infertility due to polycystic ovary syndrome
    Nie, Huilong
    Zhang, Lin
    Luo, Xiping
    [J]. PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2021,
  • [8] Letrozole vs clomiphene citrate in Sudanese patients with infertility secondary to polycystic ovary syndrome
    Elkhalifa, Warda Salah
    Suliman, Hayat Mohamed
    Abdoon, Iman H.
    Mohamed, Walaa
    Osman, Bashier
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (07)
  • [9] Letrozole, Gonadotropin, or Clomiphene for Unexplained Infertility EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Diamond, Michael P.
    Legro, Richard S.
    Coutifaris, Christos
    Alvero, Ruben
    Robinson, Randal D.
    Casson, Peter
    Christman, Gregory M.
    Ager, Joel
    Huang, Hao
    Hansen, Karl R.
    Baker, Valerie
    Usadi, Rebecca
    Seungdamrong, Aimee
    Bates, G. Wright
    Rosen, R. Mitchell
    Haisenleder, Daniel
    Krawetz, Stephen A.
    Barnhart, Kurt
    Trussell, J. C.
    Ohl, Dana
    Jin, Yufeng
    Santoro, Nanette
    Eisenberg, Esther
    Zhang, Heping
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (12) : 757 - 758
  • [10] Meta-analysis of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in polycystic ovary syndrome
    He, Donghong
    Jiang, Fengyan
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2011, 23 (01) : 91 - 96