Regional competition, environmental decentralization, and target selection of local governments

被引:88
|
作者
Li, Guoxiang [1 ]
Guo, Fanyong [2 ]
Di, Danyang [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Adm, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Regional competition; Environmental responsibility; Porter effect; Financial pressure; Environmental pollution; FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CHINA; CENTRALIZATION; PROTECTIONISM; REGULATIONS; FEDERALISM; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142536
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Promoting environmental management system reform in an orderly manner and coordinating central and local environmental protection responsibilities are important for high-quality economic development. Based on panel data of 289 cities in China from 2008 to 2016, this paper uses the fixed effects model and threshold regression model to discuss the relationships among regional competition, environmental decentralization, and target selection of local governments and to analyze whether environmental decentralization produces the Porter effect. Findings show that environmental decentralization does significantly promote economic development, strengthen environmental pollution control, and generate a strong Porter effect, due to greater R&D investment, improvement in green technology innovation ability, and optimization of the industrial structure. The effect of environmental decentralization shows significant regional heterogeneity in terms of regional financial pressure, economic development level, and environmental pressure, while regional competition distorts the effect of environmental decentralization. With the intensification of regional competition, environmental decentralization greatly improves the emission intensity of pollutants, whereas it promotes economic development after inhibiting it. The above conclusions are of great significance for pushing forward environmental decentralization, formulating a differentiated environmental decentralization strategy, and perfecting the government performance appraisal system. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: Evidence from China
    Wu, Haitao
    Li, Yunwei
    Hao, Yu
    Ren, Siyu
    Zhang, Pengfei
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 708
  • [2] Decentralization in Africa and the nature of local governments’ competition: evidence from Benin
    Emilie Caldeira
    Martial Foucault
    Gregoire Rota-Graziosi
    [J]. International Tax and Public Finance, 2015, 22 : 1048 - 1076
  • [3] Decentralization in Africa and the nature of local governments' competition: evidence from Benin
    Caldeira, Emilie
    Foucault, Martial
    Rota-Graziosi, Gregoire
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2015, 22 (06) : 1048 - 1076
  • [4] Decentralization and Tax Competition between Asymmetrical Local Governments: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence
    Carbonnier, Clement
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW, 2013, 41 (04) : 391 - 420
  • [5] Cost-efficiency of Japanese local governments: effects of decentralization and regional integration
    Otsuka, Akihiro
    Goto, Mika
    Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2014, 1 (01): : 207 - 220
  • [6] Decentralization and recentralization of local governments in Turkey
    Akilli, Husniye
    Akilli, H. Serkan
    [J]. 2ND WORLD CONFERENCE ON PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY (PSYSOC 2013), 2013, 140 : 682 - 686
  • [7] Decentralization and the Increased autonomy in Local Governments
    Isufaj, Mentor
    [J]. 2ND WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 109 : 459 - 463
  • [8] Post-decentralization regional economies and actors: Putting the capacity of local governments to the test
    Matsui, K
    [J]. DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 2005, 43 (01): : 171 - 189
  • [9] The Transformations of Regional and Local Governments: Implications for Environmental Policy Integration
    Dente, Bruno
    [J]. GOVERNANCE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INTEGRATION, 2010, : 77 - 85
  • [10] Drivers of Policy Instrument Selection for Environmental Management by Local Governments
    Krause, Rachel M.
    Hawkins, Christopher V.
    Park, Angela Y. S.
    Feiock, Richard C.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2019, 79 (04) : 477 - 487