The Clinical Impact of Different Coagulometers on Patient Outcomes

被引:7
|
作者
Brouwer, Jan Leendert Pouwel [1 ,2 ]
Stoevelaar, Hugo [1 ]
Sucker, Christoph [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Thrombosis Serv, NL-6718 TK Ede, Netherlands
[2] Pasana Care Grp, Dept Cardiol, NL-9101 DC Dokkum, Netherlands
[3] LaboMed Coagulat Ctr, D-10789 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Anticoagulation; CoaguChek XS; INRatio2; International normalized ratio (INR); Patient self-monitoring (PSM); Patient self-testing (PST); Point of care (POC) test (POCT); Time in therapeutic range (TTR); Time in target range; Vitamin K antagonist (VKA); ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; ORAL ANTICOAGULATION; VITAMIN-K; SELF-MANAGEMENT; WARFARIN; METAANALYSIS; STROKE; INR; VARIABILITY; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-014-0124-x
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Long-term anticoagulation therapy using vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is used in millions of patients worldwide to reduce the risk of thrombotic or thromboembolic events. Control and monitoring of VKA therapy is improved by the regular self-measurement of international normalized ratio (INR) using a home monitoring device. This retrospective analysis of a large cohort of patients in the Netherlands seeks to determine whether the choice of INR monitor could have a clinical impact on patient outcomes. The National Thrombosis Service provides medical supervision, training and support to anticoagulant patients eligible for home-monitoring of INR in the Netherlands. Two INR monitors (CoaguChek XS and INRatio2) have been distributed at random to patients since June 2011, and patient self-testing data (INR measurements and other clinical parameters) have been recorded to measure and improve treatment outcomes. The data have been retrospectively analyzed to determine any effect of the choice of monitor. Univariate and multivariate statistical tests are used to assess any differences between groups in terms of efficacy and safety parameters. Data from 4,326 patients were collated, and 156,507 INR values were included in the analysis. Over half the patients (54.3%) were being treated for atrial fibrillation, and 77.6% were prescribed acenocoumarol. There were few differences between the patient populations using the two different monitors. Anticoagulant control overall was good, with high percentage of time (87.9%) in the appropriate INR range and low incidence of excessively high or low INR values (0.085/month). Minor clinical events related to safety were low (0.78 per patient-year) and showed few differences between monitors. Mortality rates were similar [hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.70]. Self-testing data from a large cohort of patients in the Netherlands suggest that there is no clinically relevant effect of the choice of coagulation monitor (CoaguChek XS or INRatio2) on the time in therapeutic range (TTR), minor or fatal outcomes of long-term anticoagulation management.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 656
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Clinical Impact of Different Coagulometers on Patient Outcomes
    Jan Leendert Pouwel Brouwer
    Hugo Stoevelaar
    Christoph Sucker
    [J]. Advances in Therapy, 2014, 31 : 639 - 656
  • [2] Impact of Patient Portal Use on Clinical Outcomes
    McCreless, Tamuchin
    Eid, Wael
    [J]. AMCIS 2017 PROCEEDINGS, 2017,
  • [3] Impact of clinical and patient-reported outcomes on patient satisfaction with cataract extraction
    Garcia-Gutierrez, Susana
    Quintana, Jose M.
    Aguire, Urko
    Barrio, Irantzu
    Hayas, Carlota Las
    Gonzalez, Nerea
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (06) : 765 - 775
  • [4] INDIVIDUALIZING THEOPHYLLINE THERAPY - THE IMPACT OF CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES
    MUNGALL, D
    MARSHALL, J
    PENN, D
    ROBINSON, A
    SCOTT, J
    WILLIAMS, R
    HURST, D
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1983, 5 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [5] The Impact of Patient Age on Clinical Outcomes in NSCLC: A National Study
    Lou, Y.
    Manochakian, R.
    Cochuyt, J.
    Hodge, D.
    Ailawadhi, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S618 - S618
  • [6] Impact of Inpatient Harms on Hospital Finances and Patient Clinical Outcomes
    Adler, Lee
    Yi, David
    Li, Michael
    McBroom, Barry
    Hauck, Loran
    Sammer, Christine
    Jones, Cason
    Shaw, Terry
    Classen, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2018, 14 (02) : 67 - 73
  • [7] Clinical review: Impact of statin substitution policies on patient outcomes
    Atar, Dan
    Carmena, Rafael
    Clemmensen, Peter
    K-Laflamme, Annik
    Wassmann, Sven
    Lansberg, Peter
    Hobbs, Richard
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2009, 41 (04) : 242 - 256
  • [8] Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: A systematic review
    Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul
    Kumari, Varuni
    Hoque, Masuma
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Romero, Lorena
    Evans, Sue M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [9] A primary care evaluation of three near patient coagulometers
    Murray, ET
    Fitzmaurice, DA
    Allan, TF
    Hobbs, FDR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (11) : 842 - 845
  • [10] The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes
    Pitter, Michael C.
    Simmonds, Christopher
    Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha
    Hubert, Helen B.
    [J]. INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 3 (03): : 12 - 27