The effect of medication related clinical decision support at the time of physician order entry

被引:7
|
作者
Becker, Matthijs L. [1 ,2 ]
Baypinar, Fatih [1 ]
Pereboom, Marieke [1 ,2 ]
Lilih, Soufiane [1 ]
van der Hoeven, Ruud T. M. [1 ,2 ]
Giezen, Thijs J. [1 ,2 ]
Kingma, Hylke Jan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pharm Fdn Haarlem Hosp, Boerhaavelaan 24, NL-2035 RC Haarlem, Netherlands
[2] Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Netherlands
关键词
Clinical decision support systems; Computer-assisted drug therapy; Medical order entry systems; Medication errors;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-020-01121-1
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn advanced clinical decision support systems, patient characteristics and laboratory values are included in the algorithms that generate alerts. These alerts have a higher specificity than basic medication surveillance alerts. The alerts of advanced clinical decision support systems can be shown directly to the prescriber during order entry, without the risk of generating an overload of irrelevant alerts. We implemented five advanced algorithms that are shown directly to the prescriber. These algorithms are for gastrointestinal prophylaxis, folic or folinic acid prescribed with orally or subcutaneously administered methotrexate, vitamin D prescribed with bisphosphonates, hyponatremia and measuring plasma levels for vancomycin and gentamicin.ObjectiveWe evaluated the effect of the implementation of the algorithms.SettingWe performed prospective intervention studies with a historical group for comparison in both inpatients and outpatients at a teaching hospital in the Netherlands.MethodsWe compared the time period after implementation of the algorithm with the time period before implementation, using data from the hospital information system Epic. Difference in guideline adherence were analyzed using Chi square tests.Main outcome measureThe outcome measures were the number of alerts, the acceptance rate of the advice in the alert, and for the algorithm measuring plasma levels for vancomycin and gentamicin the time to the correct dose.ResultsFor all algorithms, the implementation resulted in a significant increase in guideline adherence, varying from 11 to 36%. The acceptance rate varied from 14% for hyponatremia to 90% for methotrexate. For gastrointestinal prophylaxis the acceptance rate was 4.4% for basic drug-drug interaction alerts when no gastrointestinal prophylaxis was prescribed and increased to 44.7% after implementation of the advanced algorithm. This algorithm substantially decreased the number of alerts from 812 before implementation to 217 after implementation. After implementation of the algorithm for measuring plasma levels for vancomycin and gentamicin, the proportion of patients receiving the correct dose after 48 h increased from 73 to 84% (p = 0.03).ConclusionImplementation of advanced algorithms that take patient characteristics into account and are shown directly to the physician during order entry, result in an increased guideline adherence.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 143
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of medication related clinical decision support at the time of physician order entry
    Matthijs L. Becker
    Fatih Baypinar
    Marieke Pereboom
    Soufiane Lilih
    Ruud T. M. van der Hoeven
    Thijs J. Giezen
    Hylke Jan Kingma
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2021, 43 : 137 - 143
  • [2] Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety - A systematic review
    Kaushal, R
    Shojania, KG
    Bates, DW
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (12) : 1409 - 1416
  • [3] Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: A review
    Kuperman, Gilad J.
    Bobb, Anne
    Payne, Thomas H.
    Avery, Anthony J.
    Gandhi, Tejal K.
    Burns, Gerard
    Classen, David C.
    Bates, David W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2007, 14 (01) : 29 - 40
  • [4] Benefit of medication reviews by renal pharmacists in the setting of a computerized physician order entry system with clinical decision support
    Seiberth, Sarah
    Mannell, Hanna
    Birkenmaier, Christof
    Neuerburg, Carl
    Smolka, Vera
    Andraschko, Monika
    Strobach, Dorothea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 47 (10) : 1531 - 1538
  • [5] Decision support for medication use in an inpatient physician order entry application and a pharmacy application
    Kuperman, GJ
    Cooley, T
    Tremblay, J
    Teich, JM
    Churchill, W
    [J]. MEDINFO '98 - 9TH WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL INFORMATICS, PTS 1 AND 2, 1998, 52 : 467 - 471
  • [6] Integrating decision support into computerized physician order entry
    Rosenbloom, ST
    Talbert, D
    Aronsky, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2001, : 1009 - 1009
  • [7] Computerized physician order entry and online decision support
    Handler, JA
    Feied, CF
    Coonan, K
    Vozenilek, J
    Gillam, M
    Peacock, PR
    Sinert, R
    Smith, MS
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (11) : 1135 - 1141
  • [8] Medication Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support: Current Nursing Informatics Issues
    Gideon, Amy C.
    DiPersio, David M.
    [J]. NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 50 (02) : 315 - +
  • [9] Reduction in chemotherapy order errors with computerised physician order entry and clinical decision support systems
    Aziz, Muhammad Tahir
    Ur-Rehman, Tofeeq
    Qureshi, Sadia
    Bukhari, Nadeem Irfan
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 44 (03) : 13 - 22
  • [10] Effectiveness of a real-time clinical decision support system for computerized physician order entry of plasma orders
    Yazer, Mark H.
    Triulzi, Darrell J.
    Reddy, Vivek
    Waters, Jonathan H.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2013, 53 (12) : 3120 - 3127