Lessons from the first year of compliance sampling under Michigan's revised Lead and Copper Rule and national Lead and Copper Rule implications

被引:1
|
作者
Betanzo, Elin [1 ]
Rhyan, Corwin [2 ]
Hanna-Attisha, Mona [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Safe Water Engn LLC, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Altarum Inst, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Flint, MI USA
[4] Hurley Childrens Hosp, Pediat Publ Hlth Initiat, Flint, MI USA
来源
AWWA WATER SCIENCE | 2021年 / 3卷 / 06期
关键词
compliance sampling; Lead and Copper Rule; lead service line; water quality data;
D O I
10.1002/aws2.1261
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
In 2018, Michigan revised its Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) compliance sampling requirements to better represent the potential lead contribution from lead service lines (LSLs). The first year of sampling results under the new requirements were analyzed to determine their impact on lead sampling results. The dataset reveals statistically significant higher detected lead levels, both at individual sample sites and in some water system 90th percentiles. Michigan's LCR results reveal the percentage of public water systems with LSLs exceeding the lead action level (15 ppb) increasing to 13% compared to 2% under the previous sampling protocol. Michigan's experience demonstrates that solely collecting first-liter data, consistent with current LCR requirements, is inadequate for detecting the higher range of lead concentrations commonly found in LSL samples. As the 2021 EPA LCR revision includes fifth-liter and removes first-liter compliance sampling, Michigan's lessons portend national implications. This paper evaluates Michigan's novel 2019 LCR results, compares the results to previous sampling periods, and shares lessons learned for timely national policy decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Prepare to Comply With the Revised Lead and Copper Rule
    Estes-Smargiassi, Stephen
    Via, Steve
    [J]. Opflow, 2021, 47 (04): : 6 - 7
  • [2] Revised Lead and Copper Rule Delayed Again
    不详
    [J]. GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2018, 38 (04): : 6 - 7
  • [3] Water regulation: Lead, copper rule change for Michigan
    Russell, Pam Radtke
    [J]. ENR (Engineering News-Record), 2017, 278 (12): : 8 - 9
  • [4] Revised Lead and Copper Rule: Proactive Customer Service
    Dufresne, Alicia
    Lescault, Sarah
    [J]. Journal of the New England Water Works Association, 2023, 137 (03) : 16 - 19
  • [5] Importance of pipe deposits to Lead and Copper Rule compliance
    Schock, Michael R.
    Cantor, Abigail F.
    Triantafyllidou, Simoni
    Desantis, Michael K.
    Scheckel, Kirk G.
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 106 (07): : E336 - E349
  • [6] First draw on lead and copper rule revisions
    Pontius Water Consultants Inc., 6657 W. Ottawa Ave., Littleton, CO 80218, United States
    [J]. J Am Water Works Assoc, 2007, 12 (14-24):
  • [7] First Draw on lead and copper rule revisions
    Pontius, Fred
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2007, 99 (12): : 14 - +
  • [9] MONITORING AND CONTROL EXPERIENCE UNDER THE LEAD AND COPPER RULE
    RAMALEY, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1993, 85 (02): : 64 - 67
  • [10] Reflections on the Lead and Copper Rule and Lead Levels in Flint's Water
    Masten, Susan J.
    Davies, Simon H.
    Haider, Syed W.
    McPherson, Calley R.
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 111 (09): : 42 - 55