Conservation policies in Brazil and the European Union: same objectives, different problems

被引:0
|
作者
Carballal, Manuel [1 ]
Ambrosio Ferreira, Jose [1 ]
Leles Romarco, Marcelo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Econ Rural, Ave Pudue S-N,Campus Univ, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
来源
BOSQUE | 2017年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
conflict; conservation units; ecology; Natura; 2000;
D O I
10.4067/S0717-92002017000100002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Nature's conservation has been associated with the dispute of territory from its origins till today. Reducing the limits of property rights and dynamics of use and occupation have been the most widely used techniques to achieve a clear objective as is the preservation of areas with high environmental value. The concept of ecology and conservation has evolved along the last years, starting from the elimination of the human presence in delimited areas. Therefore, it has passed from limiting human presence in delimited areas to coexistence between humans and environment. The most used tool for nature's preservation is the creation of conservation areas, though these have always been associated with the generation of conflicts and problems. In this paper, two conservation models possessing the same objective although using different methods, such as conservation areas of sustainable use in Brazil and the European Union, were compared. Consequently, it explains what they are and describes the problems and conflicts they generate or may generate. Subsequently, a comparison of the two models was made, where the advantages and disadvantages of each one were obtained. Finally, it is concluded that environmental policies should be based on the participation of key players and the existence of lack of information may lead to a rejection of environmental policies.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The alignment of agricultural and nature conservation policies in the European Union
    Hodge, Ian
    Hauck, Jennifer
    Bonn, Aletta
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) : 996 - 1005
  • [2] Gender equality and the state: a review of objectives, policies and progress in the European Union
    Tomlinson, Jennifer
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 22 (18): : 3755 - 3774
  • [3] European Union policies for the conservation-restoration of cultural heritage
    Serain, Clement
    [J]. IN SITU-REVUE DE PATRIMOINES, 2018, (34):
  • [4] EUROPEAN UNION POLICIES AND THE PROBLEMS OF MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISES
    BREWER, T
    YOUNG, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 1995, 29 (01) : 33 - 52
  • [5] INSTRUMENTS FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC ENERGY POLICIES: BRAZIL AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Lima Bianchi, Patricia Nunes
    [J]. REVISTA DE DIREITO DA CIDADE-CITY LAW, 2019, 11 (01): : 1 - 36
  • [6] Objectives and competences in the European Union
    Casolari, Federico
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2016, 53 (04): : 1141 - 1143
  • [7] Health expectancies in the European Union: same concept, different methods, different results
    Santos, Joao Vasco
    Viana, Joao
    Devleesschauwer, Brecht
    Haagsma, Juanita A.
    Santos, Cristina Costa
    Ricciardi, Walter
    Freitas, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2021, 75 (08): : 764 - 771
  • [8] Different yet the same? Differentiated integration and flexibility in implementation in the European Union
    Princen, Sebastiaan
    Schimmelfennig, Frank
    Sczepanski, Ronja
    Smekal, Hubert
    Zbiral, Robert
    [J]. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2024, 47 (03) : 466 - 490
  • [9] The Role of Published Information in Reviewing Conservation Objectives for Natura 2000 Protected Areas in the European Union
    Opermanis, Otars
    MacSharry, Brian
    Bailly-Maitre, Jerome
    Evans, Douglas
    Sipkova, Zelmira
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 53 (03) : 702 - 712
  • [10] The Role of Published Information in Reviewing Conservation Objectives for Natura 2000 Protected Areas in the European Union
    Otars Opermanis
    Brian MacSharry
    Jerome Bailly-Maitre
    Douglas Evans
    Zelmira Sipkova
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2014, 53 : 702 - 712