Who may carry out protective deterrence?

被引:1
|
作者
Sprague, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
来源
PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY | 2004年 / 54卷 / 216期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0031-8094.2004.00365.x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Anthony Ellis argues that institutional punishment occurs automatically in a way analogous to mechanical deterrents, and given that issuing real threats is justified for self-defence, institutional punishment, intended to protect society via deterrence, can be justified without violating the Kantian constraint against using persons as means only. But institutional punishments are not in fact executed automatically: they must be carried out by moral agents. Ellis fails to provide a basis for those agents to justify the performance of their legal duties.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 447
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条