Enhanced Defense Responses in Arabidopsis Induced by the Cell Wall Protein Fractions from Pythium oligandrum Require SGT1, RAR1, NPR1 and JAR1

被引:39
|
作者
Kawamura, Yoko [1 ]
Takenaka, Shigehito [2 ]
Hase, Shu [1 ]
Kubota, Mayumi [3 ]
Ichinose, Yuki [4 ]
Kanayama, Yoshinori [5 ]
Nakaho, Kazuhiro [6 ]
Klessig, Daniel F. [7 ]
Takahashi, Hideki [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Agr Sci, Dept Life Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9818555, Japan
[2] Natl Agr Res Ctr Hokkaido Reg, Dept Upland Agr, Memuro, Hokkaido 0820071, Japan
[3] Gifu Univ, Fac Appl Biol Sci, Plant Pathol Lab, Gifu, Japan
[4] Okayama Univ, Lab Plant Pathol & Genet Engn, Fac Agr, Okayama 7008530, Japan
[5] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Agr Sci, Dept Biol Resource Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9818555, Japan
[6] Natl Agr Res Ctr, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058666, Japan
[7] Cornell Univ, Boyce Thompson Inst, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
Elicitin; Ethylene; Induced resistance; Jasmonic acid; Pseudomonas syringae; Ralstonia solanaceraum; INDUCED SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE; DISEASE RESISTANCE; SALICYLIC-ACID; SIGNALING PATHWAYS; JASMONIC ACID; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; BACTERIAL WILT; LRR PROTEINS; DAMPING-OFF; SUGAR-BEET;
D O I
10.1093/pcp/pcp044
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The cell wall protein fraction (CWP) is purified from the non-pathogenic biocontrol agent Pythium oligandrum and is composed of two glycoproteins (POD-1 and POD-2), which are structurally similar to class III elicitins. In tomato plants treated with CWP, jasmonic acid (JA)- and ethylene (ET)-dependent signaling pathways are activated, and resistance to Ralstonia solanaceraum is enhanced. To dissect CWP-induced defense mechanisms, we investigated defense gene expression and resistance to bacterial pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Col-0 treated with CWP. When the leaves of Col-0 were infiltrated with CWP, neither visible necrosis nor salicylic acid (SA)-responsive gene (PR-1 and PR-5) expression was induced. In contrast, JA-responsive gene (PDF1.2 and JR2) expression was up-regulated and the resistance to R. solanaceraum and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 was enhanced in response to CWP. Such CWP-induced defense responses were completely compromised in CWP-treated coi1-1 and jar1-1 mutants with an impaired JA signaling pathway. The induction of defense-related gene expression after CWP treatment was partially compromised in ET-insensitive ein2-1 mutants, but not in SA signaling mutants or nahG transgenic plants. Global gene expression analysis using cDNA array also suggested that several other JA- and ET-responsive genes, but not SA-responsive genes, were up-regulated in response to CWP. Further analysis of CWP-induced defense responses using another eight mutants with impaired defense signaling pathways indicated that, interestingly, the induction of JA-responsive gene expression and enhanced resistance to two bacterial pathogens in response to CWP were completely compromised in rar1-1, rar1-21, sgt1a-1, sgt1b (edm1) and npr1-1 mutants. Thus, the CWP-induced defense system appears to be regulated by JA-mediated and SGT1-, RAR1- and NPR1-dependent signaling pathways.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 934
页数:11
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] The early organelle migration response of Arabidopsis to Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis is independent of RAR1, SGT1b, PAD4 and NPR1
    Hermanns, Monika
    Slusarenko, Alan J.
    Schlaich, Nikolaus L.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2008, 72 (1-3) : 96 - 101
  • [2] Signal transduction downstream of salicylic and jasmonic acid in herbivory-induced parasitoid attraction by Arabidopsis is independent of JAR1 and NPR1
    van Poecke, RMP
    Dicke, M
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 26 (09): : 1541 - 1548
  • [3] Characterization of the Roles of SGT1/RAR1, EDS1/NDR1, NPR1, and NRC/ADR1/NRG1 in Sw-5b-Mediated Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus
    Chen, Zhengqiang
    Wu, Qian
    Tong, Cong
    Chen, Hongyu
    Miao, Dan
    Qian, Xin
    Zhao, Xiaohui
    Jiang, Lei
    Tao, Xiaorong
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2021, 13 (08):
  • [4] C6-aldehyde-induced defense responses of Arabidopsis are affected by ETR1-, JAR1 and PAD2-related signaling pathway but not by NPR1-related signaling pathway
    Kishimoto, K
    Matsui, K
    Ozawa, R
    Takabayashi, J
    PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 47 : S104 - S104