Global Ionosphere Mapping and Differential Code Bias Estimation during Low and High Solar Activity Periods with GIMAS Software

被引:37
|
作者
Zhang, Qiang [1 ]
Zhao, Qile [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, GNSS Res Ctr, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Earth & Space Sci, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
global ionosphere mapping; total electron content; differential code bias; GNSS; Jason-2; spherical harmonic expansion; GIMAS; TOTAL ELECTRON-CONTENT; POSITIONING SYSTEM; VTEC; SERVICE; MAPS;
D O I
10.3390/rs10050705
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ionosphere research using the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) techniques is a hot topic, with their unprecedented high temporal and spatial sampling rate. We introduced a new GNSS Ionosphere Monitoring and Analysis Software (GIMAS) in order to model the global ionosphere vertical total electron content (VTEC) maps and to estimate the GPS and GLObalnaya NAvigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema (GLONASS) satellite and receiver differential code biases (DCBs). The GIMAS-based Global Ionosphere Map (GIM) products during low (day of year from 202 to 231, in 2008) and high (day of year from 050 to 079, in 2014) solar activity periods were investigated and assessed. The results showed that the biases of the GIMAS-based VTEC maps relative to the International GNSS Service (IGS) Ionosphere Associate Analysis Centers (IAACs) VTEC maps ranged from -3.0 to 1.0 TECU (TEC unit) (1 TECU = 1 x 10(16) electrons/m(2)). The standard deviations (STDs) ranged from 0.7 to 1.9 TECU in 2008, and from 2.0 to 8.0 TECU in 2014. The STDs at a low latitude were significantly larger than those at middle and high latitudes, as a result of the ionospheric latitudinal gradients. When compared with the Jason-2 VTEC measurements, the GIMAS-based VTEC maps showed a negative systematic bias of about -1.8 TECU in 2008, and a positive systematic bias of about +2.2 TECU in 2014. The STDs were about 2.0 TECU in 2008, and ranged from 2.2 to 8.5 TECU in 2014. Furthermore, the aforementioned characteristics were strongly related to the conditions of the ionosphere variation and the geographic latitude. The GPS and GLONASS satellite and receiver P1-P2 DCBs were compared with the IAACs DCBs. The root mean squares (RMSs) were 0.16-0.20 ns in 2008 and 0.13-0.25 ns in 2014 for the GPS satellites and 0.26-0.31 ns in 2014 for the GLONASS satellites. The RMSs of receiver DCBs were 0.21-0.42 ns in 2008 and 0.33-1.47 ns in 2014 for GPS and 0.67-0.96 ns in 2014 for GLONASS. The monthly stability of the GPS satellite DCBs was about 0.04 ns (0.07 ns) in 2008 (2014) and that for the GLONASS satellite DCBs was about 0.09 ns in 2014. The receiver DCBs were less stable than the satellite DCBs, with a mean value of about 0.16 ns (0.47 ns) in 2008 (2014) for GPS, and 0.48 ns in 2014 for GLONASS. It can be demonstrated that the GIMAS software had a high accuracy and reliability for the global ionosphere monitoring and analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Differential Code Bias Estimation using Multi-GNSS Observations and Global Ionosphere Maps
    Montenbruck, O.
    Hauschild, A.
    Steigenberger, P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION, 2014, : 802 - 812
  • [2] Differential Code Bias Estimation using Multi-GNSS Observations and Global Ionosphere Maps
    Montenbruck, O.
    Hauschild, A.
    Steigenberger, P.
    NAVIGATION-JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION, 2014, 61 (03): : 191 - 201
  • [3] Combined GPS/GLONASS global ionosphere mapping considering the GLONASS inter-frequency differential code bias
    Qiang Zhang
    Jun Tao
    Xuanzuo Liu
    Zhigang Hu
    Qile Zhao
    GPS Solutions, 2023, 27
  • [4] Combined GPS/GLONASS global ionosphere mapping considering the GLONASS inter-frequency differential code bias
    Zhang, Qiang
    Tao, Jun
    Liu, Xuanzuo
    Hu, Zhigang
    Zhao, Qile
    GPS SOLUTIONS, 2023, 27 (03)
  • [5] Analysis and comparison of ionosphere behavior and point positioning in periods of high and low solar activity
    Salomoni, Christiane Silva
    Matsuoka, Marcelo Tomio
    De Souza, Sergio Florencio
    Camargo, Paulo De Oliveira
    BOLETIM DE CIENCIAS GEODESICAS, 2009, 15 (03): : 333 - 351
  • [6] Comparison of Phase Scintillations During Low and High Solar Activity Periods
    Rashid, N. M. A.
    Homam, M. J.
    2015 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (ISAP), 2015,
  • [7] Wavenumber-4 structures observed in the low-latitude ionosphere during low and high solar activity periods using FORMOSAT/COSMIC observations
    Onohara, Amelia Naomi
    Batista, Inez Staciarini
    Batista, Paulo Prado
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2018, 36 (02) : 459 - 471
  • [8] THE BEHAVIOR OF MEASURED SEU AT LOW ALTITUDE DURING PERIODS OF HIGH SOLAR-ACTIVITY
    HARBOESORENSEN, R
    DALY, EJ
    UNDERWOOD, CI
    WARD, J
    ADAMS, L
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1990, 37 (06) : 1938 - 1946
  • [9] TOPSIDE IONOSPHERE CHARGED-PARTICLE DISTRIBUTIONS DURING HIGH AND LOW SOLAR-ACTIVITY
    CHAN, KL
    DUFOUR, SW
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1973, 54 (11): : 1159 - 1159
  • [10] THE RELATION BETWEEN COSMIC-RAY INTENSITY AND GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY DURING PERIODS OF HIGH AND LOW SOLAR ACTIVITY
    VANDERWALT, R
    NUOVO CIMENTO, 1959, 13 (05): : 936 - 943