The evaluation of hospital service quality by fuzzy MCDM

被引:83
|
作者
Akdag, Herman [1 ]
Kalayci, Turgay [2 ]
Karagoz, Suat [3 ]
Zulfikar, Haluk [3 ]
Giz, Deniz [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 08, LIASD, F-93526 St Denis, France
[2] Istanbul Univ, Comp Sci Applicat & Res Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Fac Econ, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
MCDM; Fuzzy sets; OWA; AHP; TOPSIS; Compensatory AND; Yager's min-max; Service quality; Health statistics; SATISFACTION; RANKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.033
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study applies the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to evaluate the service quality of some Turkish hospitals. In general the service quality has abstract properties, which mean that using the previously known measurement approach is insufficient. It is for this reason that the fuzzy set theory is adopted as a research template. In Istanbul, Turkey, there are four B class hospitals classed as private hospitals that are covered by the Social Security Institution (SSI) and for which we propose to represent the service performance measurement using triangular fuzzy numbers. In this study, importance weights of performance criteria are found with AHP. Then, the Multiple Criteria Decision Making methods TOPSIS and Yager's min-max approach are applied to find and rank the crisp performance values. In a second step, an aggregation of performance criteria with OWA and Compensatory AND operators are looked at instead of the TOPSIS method and min-max approach. Thereby numerical applications are supplied by the four methods and the obtained results are compared. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 248
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM
    Tsaur, SH
    Chang, TY
    Yen, CH
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 23 (02) : 107 - 115
  • [2] Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for hospital service quality
    Wang, S
    Wang, DW
    [J]. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Quality & Reliability, 2005, : 3 - 7
  • [3] Hospital Service Quality Evaluation: A Fuzzy Preference Relation Approach
    Chang, Tsung-Han
    [J]. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ 2011), 2011, : 517 - 522
  • [4] Benchmarking of airports service quality by a new fuzzy MCDM approach
    Lupo, Toni
    [J]. EUROPEAN TRANSPORT-TRASPORTI EUROPEI, 2015, (57):
  • [5] Evaluation of hospital service quality based on fuzzy multiple rndex approach
    Guan, ZM
    Wang, D
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2005, : 173 - 178
  • [6] Hospital service quality evaluation: an integrated model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
    Melih Yucesan
    Muhammet Gul
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2020, 24 : 3237 - 3255
  • [7] Hospital service quality evaluation: an integrated model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
    Yucesan, Melih
    Gul, Muhammet
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (05) : 3237 - 3255
  • [8] AN INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY PROMETHEE APPROACH FOR HOSPITAL SERVICE QUALITY EVALUATION
    Sennaroglu, Bahar
    Mutlu, Meltem
    Tuzkaya, Gulfem
    [J]. UNCERTAINTY MODELLING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 10 : 588 - 594
  • [9] Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating Intangible Resources Affecting Port Service Quality
    Pak, Ji Yeong
    Thai, Vinh V.
    Yeo, Gi Tae
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS, 2015, 31 (04): : 459 - 468
  • [10] A Fuzzy MCDM Model for Facility Location Evaluation Based on Quality of Life
    Aditi
    Kaul, Arshia
    Darbari, Jyoti Dhingra
    Jha, P. C.
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING, SOCPROS 2018, VOL 1, 2020, 1048 : 687 - 697