Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management - A systematic review

被引:246
|
作者
Walsh, Judith M. E.
McDonald, Kathryn M.
Shojania, Kaveh G.
Sundaram, Vandana
Nayak, Smita
Lewis, Robyn
Owens, Douglas K.
Goldstein, Mary Kane
机构
[1] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Geriatr Res Educ & Clin, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Ctr Primary Care & Outcomes Res, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
关键词
quality improvement; blood pressure; hypertension; guideline implementation;
D O I
10.1097/01.mlr.0000220260.30768.32
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Care remains suboptimal for many patients with hypertension. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of quality improvement (QI) strategies in lowering blood pressure. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane databases, and article bibliographies were searched for this study. Study Selection: Trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series evaluating QI interventions targeting hypertension control and reporting blood pressure outcomes were studied. Data Extraction: Two reviewers abstracted data and classified QI strategies into categories: provider education, provider reminders, facilitated relay of clinical information, patient education, self-management, patient reminders, audit and feedback, team change, or financial incentives were extracted. Data Synthesis: Forty-four articles reporting 57 comparisons underwent quantitative analysis. Patients in the intervention groups experienced median reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) that were 4.5 mm Hg (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.5 to 11.0) and 2.1 mm Hg (IQR: -0.2 to 5.0) greater than observed for control patients. Median increases in the percentage of individuals achieving target goals for SBP and DBP were 16.2% (IQR: 10.3 to 32.2) and 6.0% (IQR: 1.5 to 17.5). Interventions that included team change as a QI strategy were associated with the largest reductions in blood pressure outcomes. All team change studies included assignment of some responsibilities to a health professional other than the patient's physician. Limitations: Not all QI strategies have been assessed equally, which limits the power to compare differences in effects between strategies. Conclusion: QI strategies are associated with improved hypertension control. A focus on hypertension by someone in addition to the patient's physician was associated with substantial improvement. Future research should examine the contributions of individual QI strategies and their relative costs.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 657
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality-improvement strategies for the management of hypertension in chronic kidney disease in primary care: a systematic review
    Gallagher, Hugh
    de Lusignan, Simon
    Harris, Kevin
    Cates, Christopher
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2010, 60 (575):
  • [2] Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Ivers, Noah M.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Moher, David
    Turner, Lucy
    Galipeau, James
    Halperin, Ilana
    Vachon, Brigitte
    Ramsay, Tim
    Manns, Braden
    Tonelli, Marcello
    Shojania, Kaveh
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9833): : 2252 - 2261
  • [3] Quality Improvement Strategies for Children With Asthma A Systematic Review
    Bravata, Dena M.
    Gienger, Allison L.
    Holty, Jon-Erik C.
    Sundaram, Vandana
    Khazeni, Nayer
    Wise, Paul H.
    McDonald, Kathryn M.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2009, 163 (06): : 572 - 581
  • [4] The effectiveness of person-centred quality improvement strategies on the management and control of hypertension in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Manalili, Kimberly
    Lorenzetti, Diane L.
    Egunsola, Oluwaseun
    O'Beirne, Maeve
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda
    Scott, Catherine M.
    Santana, Maria J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (02) : 260 - 277
  • [5] Improving antibiotic selection - A systematic review and quantitative analysis of quality improvement strategies
    Steinman, Michael A.
    Ranji, Sumant R.
    Shojania, Kaveh G.
    Gonzales, Ralph
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (07) : 617 - 628
  • [6] The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: a review of systematic reviews
    Dionne S. Kringos
    Rosa Sunol
    Cordula Wagner
    Russell Mannion
    Philippe Michel
    Niek S. Klazinga
    Oliver Groene
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 15
  • [7] The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: a review of systematic reviews
    Kringos, Dionne S.
    Sunol, Rosa
    Wagner, Cordula
    Mannion, Russell
    Michel, Philippe
    Klazinga, Niek S.
    Groene, Oliver
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [8] Impact of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life of individuals post-stroke: a systematic review
    Munce, Sarah E. P.
    Perrier, Laure
    Shin, Saeha
    Adhihetty, Chamila
    Pitzul, Kristen
    Nelson, Michelle L. A.
    Bayley, Mark T.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (08) : 1055 - 1061
  • [9] Screening strategies for hypertension: a systematic review protocol
    Schmidt, Bey-Marrie
    Durao, Solange
    Toews, Ingrid
    Bavuma, Charlotte M.
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Kredo, Tamara
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [10] Implementing quality improvement strategies to reduce healthcare-associated infections: A systematic review
    Mauger, Barbara
    Marbella, Anne
    Pines, Elizabeth
    Chopra, Ryan
    Black, Edgar R.
    Aronson, Naomi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2014, 42 (10) : S274 - S283