Quality Physical Education: A Commentary on Effective Physical Education Teaching

被引:66
|
作者
Dyson, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland 1150, New Zealand
关键词
content knowledge; holistic approach; policy impact; STUDENT RELATIONSHIPS; CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; ASSESSMENTS; CURRICULUM; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1080/02701367.2014.904155
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In my commentary in response to the 3 articles (McKenzie & Lounsbery, 2013; Rink, 2013; Ward, 2013), I focus on 3 areas: (a) content knowledge, (b) a holistic approach to physical education, and (c) policy impact. I use the term quality teaching rather than teacher effectiveness. Quality teaching is a term with the potential to move our attention beyond a focus merely on issues of effectiveness relating to the achievement of prespecified objectives. I agree with Ward that teacher content knowledge is limited in physical education, and I argue that if the student does not have a connection to or relationship with the content, this will diminish their learning gains. I also argue for a more holistic approach to physical education coming from a broader conception. Physical educators who teach the whole child advocate for a plethora of physical activity, skills, knowledge, and positive attitudes that foster healthy and active playful lifestyles. Play is a valuable educational experience. I also endorse viewing assessment from different perspectives and discuss assessment through a social-critical political lens. The 3 articles also have implications for policy. Physical education is much broader than just physical activity, and we harm the future potential of our field if we adopt a narrow agenda. Looking to the future, I propose that we broaden the kinds of research that we value, support, and appreciate in our field.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条