Risk communication and sustainability science: lessons from the field

被引:21
|
作者
Lindenfeld, Laura [1 ]
Smith, Hollie M. [1 ]
Norton, Todd [2 ]
Grecu, Natalie C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maine, Dept Commun & Journalism, Margaret Chase Smith Policy Ctr, Maines Sustainabil Solut Initiat, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Edward R Murrow Coll Commun, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
Sustainability science; Risk communication; Mental models; Transdisciplinarity; Communication theory; Uncertainty; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION; POLICY; UNCERTAINTY; RESILIENCE; VULNERABILITY; COPRODUCTION; GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-013-0230-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability science aims to help societies across the globe address the increased environmental and health crises and risks that range from poverty to climate change to health pandemics. With the increased magnitude and frequency of these large-scale risks to different societies, scientists and institutions have increasingly recognized the need for improved communication and collaboration among researchers, governments, businesses, and communities. This article argues that risk communication has fundamentally important contributions to make to sustainability science's mission to create use-inspired, "actionable science" that can lead to solutions. Risk communication research can advance the mission of sustainability science to engage a wide range of stakeholders. This kind of engagement is especially important in the context of addressing sustainability problems that are characterized by high levels of uncertainty and complexity. We introduce three core tenets of risk communication research that are fundamental to advancing sustainability science. Risk communication specifically offers an increased understanding of how system feedbacks, human perceptions, and levels of uncertainty influence the study and design of solutions within social ecological systems.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 127
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk communication and sustainability science: lessons from the field
    Laura Lindenfeld
    Hollie M. Smith
    Todd Norton
    Natalie C. Grecu
    Sustainability Science, 2014, 9 : 119 - 127
  • [2] Lessons from science communication training
    Warren, Dana R.
    Weiss, Marissa S.
    Wolfe, David W.
    Friedlander, Blaine
    Lewenstein, Bruce
    SCIENCE, 2007, 316 (5828) : 1122 - 1122
  • [3] Science Communication and Stakeholder Expertise: Insights from Sustainability Science
    Suldovsky, Brianne
    McGreavy, Bridie
    Lindenfeld, Laura
    ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2017, 11 (05): : 587 - 592
  • [4] Some lessons from COVID: science and communication
    Baker, Edward N.
    IUCRJ, 2021, 8 : 331 - 332
  • [5] Improving Software Sustainability: Lessons Learned from Profiles in Science
    Gallagher, Marie E.
    ARCHIVING 2013: FINAL PROGRAM AND PROCEEDINGS, 2013, : 74 - 79
  • [6] Science Communication Lessons from "Kofta-Gate"
    Hussein, Islam
    AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 2019, 107 (04) : 218 - 223
  • [7] Rethinking Risk Communication: Lessons From a Pandemic
    Mitchell, Scott S. D.
    Beanlands, Josh
    TOPIA-CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL STUDIES, 2020, (41) : 88 - 95
  • [8] Communicating Sustainability: Sustainability and Communication in the Engineering, Science, and Technical Communication Classrooms
    Anderson, Jessica L.
    Chenoweth, Steve
    DeVasher, Rebecca
    House, Richard
    Livingston, Jessica
    Minster, Mark
    Taylor, Corey
    Watt, Anneliese
    Williams, Julia M.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE, 2008, : 16 - +
  • [9] Pursuitworthiness in urgent research: Lessons on well-ordered science from sustainability science
    Stojanovic, Milutin
    STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2023, 98 : 49 - 61
  • [10] Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: Part 1
    Serenella Sala
    Francesca Farioli
    Alessandra Zamagni
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1653 - 1672