Long-term management of chronic pain with transdermal buprenorphine: A multicenter, open-label, follow-up study in patients from three short-term clinical trials

被引:42
|
作者
Likar, Rudolf
Kayser, Hubertus
Sittl, Reinhard
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Klagenfurt, Pain Clin, Klagenfurt, Austria
[2] Practice Anesthesiol & Special Pain Therapy, Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Pain Clin, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
buprenorphine; transdermal; cancer pain; chronic pain; long-acting opioid;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.06.012
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Transdermal buprenorphine is available in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain. It has been evaluated at doses of 35, 52.5, and 70 mu g/h for the management of moderate to severe chronic cancer and noncancer pain in 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, each of limited duration (similar to 14 days each). Long-term data are essential to determining the performance of an analgesic in the management of chronic pain. Objective: The purpose of this follow-up study was to obtain data on the efficacy and tolerability of longterm treatment with transdermal buprenorphine in cancer and noncancer patients with chronic persistent pain of moderate to severe intensity. Methods: This was an open-label, uncontrolled, follow-up study in patients from the 3 previous clinical trials who elected to continue treatment with transdermal buprenorphine 35 mu g/h and sublingual buprenorphine tablets (0.2 mg) as needed for breakthrough pain. The patch was to be changed every 72 hours throughout the patient's course of pain therapy. At visits every 2 weeks for the first 4 weeks and every 4 weeks for the remainder of study participation, patients evaluated their pain relief retrospectively on a 4-point verbal rating scale. They also rated the ease of patch handling using a 3-point verbal rating scale. Patterns of dose escalation and dose stability were monitored over time. Adherence to therapy was determined based on the number of patients who complied with the dosing schedule. Adverse events were documented by type, intensity, location (systemic or local), and relationship to study medication. Results: Two hundred thirty-nine patients were included in this follow-up study (120 women, 119 men; 100% white; mean [SD] age, 58 [11.3] years; mean weight, 70.8 [14.7] kg). One hundred thirty-four had cancer-related pain and 105 had pain of noncancerous origin. The mean duration of participation was 7.5 months, and 37 (15.5%) patients participated for > 12 months. Maximum study participation was 3.4 years in cancer patients and 5.7 years in noncancer patients. One hundred eighty-eight (78.7%) patients were considered adherent to therapy. The majority (65.9%) of patients managed their pain with the patch alone or took no more than 1 additional sublingual tablet daily for breakthrough pain. At least satisfactory pain relief was reported by 215 (90.0%) patients, and the buprenorphine patch was generally well tolerated. The most common systemic adverse drug reactions were nausea (9.2%), dizziness (4.6%), vomiting (4.2%), constipation (3.8%), and tiredness (2.9%), whereas the most common local adverse drug reactions were erythema (12.1%), pruritus (10.5%), and exanthema (8.8%). Conclusion: Transdermal buprenorphine was generally well tolerated and effective for the long-term treatment of chronic cancer or noncancer pain in these patients who had previously received buprenorphine in 3 short-term clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 952
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LEVETIRACETAM IN IDIOPATHIC GENERALIZED EPILEPSY SYNDROMES: OPEN-LABEL, NONCOMPARATIVE, MULTICENTER, LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP STUDY
    Delanty, N.
    Jones, J.
    Tonner, F.
    EPILEPSIA, 2010, 51 : 118 - 118
  • [2] Long-Term Intrathecal Ziconotide for Chronic Pain: An Open-Label Study
    Webster, Lynn R.
    Fisher, Robert
    Charapata, Steven
    Wallace, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2009, 37 (03) : 363 - 372
  • [3] SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF METHACHOLINE SENSITIVITY
    BEWTRA, A
    TOWNLEY, R
    WATT, G
    BURKE, K
    VILLACORTE, G
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1979, 27 (02): : A394 - A394
  • [4] Rituximab in refractory myasthenia gravis: a prospective, open-label study with long-term follow-up
    Anderson, Dustin
    Phan, Cecile
    Johnston, Wendy S.
    Siddiqi, Zaeem A.
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2016, 3 (07): : 552 - 555
  • [5] Felbamate add-on in refractory epilepsy: An open-label study with long-term follow-up
    Cilio, MR
    Vigevano, F
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 42 (03) : P23 - P23
  • [6] LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF CHRONIC PAIN PATIENTS - A PRELIMINARY-STUDY
    DUCKRO, PN
    MARGOLIS, RB
    TAIT, RC
    KORYTNYK, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 1985, 15 (03): : 283 - 292
  • [7] Long-term treatment of chronic schizophrenia with risperidone: an open-label, multicenter study of 386 patients
    Moller, HJ
    Gagiano, CA
    Addington, DE
    Von Knorring, L
    Torres-Plank, JF
    Gaussares, C
    INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 13 (03) : 99 - 106
  • [8] Long-Term Clinical Follow-Up of Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis
    Thunberg, Ulrica
    Saber, Amanj
    Soderquist, Bo
    Hugosson, Svante
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 130 (05): : 504 - 512
  • [9] LEVETIRACETAM IN CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS WITH PRIMARY GENERALIZED SEIZURES: OPEN-LABEL, NONCOMPARATIVE, MULTICENTER, LONG-TERM, FOLLOW-UP STUDY
    Delanty, N.
    Jones, J.
    Wash, M.
    Tonner, F.
    EPILEPSIA, 2009, 50 : 99 - 99
  • [10] The importance of long-term follow-up in clinical trials
    Norrie, John
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 11 (07): : E995 - E996