The Tasmanian devil microbiome-implications for conservation and management

被引:99
|
作者
Cheng, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Fox, Samantha [2 ]
Pemberton, David [2 ]
Hogg, Carolyn [3 ]
Papenfuss, Anthony T. [4 ,5 ]
Belov, Katherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Vet Sci, RMC Gunn Bldg, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Dept Primary Ind Pk Water & Environm, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
[3] Zoo & Aquarium Assoc, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia
[4] Walter & Eliza Hall Inst Med Res, Bioinformat Div, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med Biol, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
来源
MICROBIOME | 2015年 / 3卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Tasmanian devil; Marsupial; Carnivore; Microbiota; Endangered species; Conservation and management; GUT MICROBIOTA; PHYLOGENETIC CHARACTERIZATION; INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA; CETOBACTERIUM-SOMERAE; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; GENETIC DIVERSITY; HEALTH; COMMUNITIES; EVOLUTION; BACTERIUM;
D O I
10.1186/s40168-015-0143-0
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: The Tasmanian devil, the world's largest carnivorous marsupial, is at risk of extinction due to devil facial tumour disease (DFTD), a fatal contagious cancer. The Save the Tasmanian Devil Program has established an insurance population, which currently holds over 600 devils in captive facilities across Australia. Microbes are known to play a crucial role in the health and well-being of humans and other animals, and increasing evidence suggests that changes in the microbiota can influence various aspects of host physiology and development. To improve our understanding of devils and facilitate management and conservation of the species, we characterised the microbiome of wild devils and investigated differences in the composition of microbial community between captive and wild individuals. Results: A total of 1,223,550 bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences were generated via Roche 454 sequencing from 56 samples, including 17 gut, 15 skin, 18 pouch and 6 oral samples. The devil's gut microbiome was dominated by Firmicutes and showed a high Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio, which appears to be a common feature of many carnivorous mammals. Metabolisms of carbohydrates, amino acids, energy, cofactors and vitamins, nucleotides and lipids were predicted as the most prominent metabolic pathways that the devil's gut flora contributed to. The microbiota inside the female's pouch outside lactation was highly similar to that of the skin, both co-dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The oral microbiome had similar proportions of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Fusobacteria. Conclusions: Compositional differences were observed in all four types of microbiota between devils from captive and wild populations. Certain captive devils had significantly lower levels of gut bacterial diversity than wild individuals, and the two groups differed in the proportion of gut bacteria accounting for the metabolism of glycan, amino acids and cofactors and vitamins. Further studies are underway to investigate whether alterations in the microbiome of captive devils can have impacts on their ability to adapt and survive following re-introduction to the wild.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management
    Yuanyuan Cheng
    Samantha Fox
    David Pemberton
    Carolyn Hogg
    Anthony T. Papenfuss
    Katherine Belov
    [J]. Microbiome, 3
  • [2] STRESS, STEM CELLS, AND THE GUT MICROBIOME-IMPLICATIONS FOR AGING
    Rodriguez-Fernandez, Imilce
    [J]. INNOVATION IN AGING, 2023, 7 : 118 - 118
  • [3] Genomics for conservation: a case study of behavioral genes in the Tasmanian devil
    Silver, Luke W.
    Hogg, Carolyn J.
    Wright, Belinda R.
    Grueber, Catherine E.
    [J]. CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2021, 22 (03) : 499 - 512
  • [4] Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease: lessons for conservation biology
    McCallum, Hamish
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (11) : 631 - 637
  • [5] Genomics for conservation: a case study of behavioral genes in the Tasmanian devil
    Luke W. Silver
    Carolyn J. Hogg
    Belinda R. Wright
    Catherine E. Grueber
    [J]. Conservation Genetics, 2021, 22 : 499 - 512
  • [6] Tasmanian Devil
    Sometimes, Alicia
    [J]. MEANJIN, 2022, 81 (03): : 135 - 135
  • [7] The Female Reproductive Tract Microbiome-Implications for Gynecologic Cancers and Personalized Medicine
    Rizzo, Anthony E.
    Gordon, Jennifer C.
    Berard, Alicia R.
    Burgener, Adam D.
    Avril, Stefanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [8] Landscape genetics of the Tasmanian devil: implications for spread of an infectious cancer
    Andrew Storfer
    Brendan Epstein
    Menna Jones
    Steven Micheletti
    Stephen F. Spear
    Shelly Lachish
    Samantha Fox
    [J]. Conservation Genetics, 2017, 18 : 1287 - 1297
  • [9] Landscape genetics of the Tasmanian devil: implications for spread of an infectious cancer
    Storfer, Andrew
    Epstein, Brendan
    Jones, Menna
    Micheletti, Steven
    Spear, Stephen F.
    Lachish, Shelly
    Fox, Samantha
    [J]. CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2017, 18 (06) : 1287 - 1297
  • [10] Tasmanian devil reintroduced
    Brainard, Jeffrey
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2020, 370 (6514) : 268 - 268