Doppler Non-invasive Monitoring of ICP in an Animal Model of Acute Intracranial Hypertension

被引:19
|
作者
Robba, Chiara [1 ]
Donnelly, Joseph [2 ]
Bertuetti, Rita [1 ]
Cardim, Danilo [2 ]
Sekhon, Mypinder S. [3 ]
Aries, Marcel [2 ]
Smielewski, Peter [2 ]
Richards, Hugh [2 ]
Czosnyka, Marek [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge Univ Hosp Trust, Neurocrit Care Unit, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Cambridge Univ Hosp Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Clin Neurosci, Div Neurosurg, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[3] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Gen Hosp, Div Crit Care Med, Dept Med, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
Intracranial pressure; Transcranial Doppler; Rabbit; Pulsatility index; CEREBRAL PERFUSION-PRESSURE; NERVE SHEATH DIAMETER; TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER; PULSATILITY INDEX; CUSHING RESPONSE; FLOW-VELOCITY; VENTRICULOSTOMY PLACEMENT; HEMORRHAGIC COMPLICATIONS; INFECTIONS; DETECT;
D O I
10.1007/s12028-015-0163-4
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
In many neurological diseases, intracranial pressure (ICP) is elevated and needs to be actively managed. ICP is typically measured with an invasive transducer, which carries risks. Non-invasive techniques for monitoring ICP (nICP) have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare three different methods of transcranial Doppler (TCD) assessment of nICP in an animal model of acute intracranial hypertension. In 28 rabbits, ICP was increased to 70-80 mmHg by infusion of Hartmann's solution into the lumbar subarachnoid space. Doppler flow velocity in the basilar artery was recorded. nICP was assessed through three different methods: Gosling's pulsatility index PI (gPI), Aaslid's method (AaICP), and a method based on diastolic blood flow velocity (FVdICP). We found a significant correlation between nICP and ICP when all infusion experiments were combined (FVdICP: r = 0.77, AaICP: r = 0.53, gPI: r = 0.54). The ability to distinguish between raised and 'normal' values of ICP was greatest for FVdICP (AUC 0.90 at ICP > 40 mmHg). When infusion experiments were considered independently, FVdICP demonstrated again the strongest correlation between changes in ICP and changes in nICP (mean r = 0.85). TCD-based methods of nICP monitoring are better at detecting changes of ICP occurring in time, rather than absolute prediction of ICP as a number. Of the studied methods of nICP, the method based on FVd is best to discriminate between raised and 'normal' ICP and to monitor relative changes of ICP.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 426
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Doppler Non-invasive Monitoring of ICP in an Animal Model of Acute Intracranial Hypertension
    Chiara Robba
    Joseph Donnelly
    Rita Bertuetti
    Danilo Cardim
    Mypinder S. Sekhon
    Marcel Aries
    Peter Smielewski
    Hugh Richards
    Marek Czosnyka
    [J]. Neurocritical Care, 2015, 23 : 419 - 426
  • [2] NON-INVASIVE ICP MONITORING
    Czosnyka, Marek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2014, 31 (05) : A9 - A9
  • [3] Transcranial Doppler Monitoring Compared with Invasive Monitoring of Intracranial Pressure During Acute Intracranial Hypertension
    Avner Sidi
    Gabriel Messinger
    Michael E. Mahla
    [J]. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1999, 15 : 185 - 195
  • [4] Transcranial Doppler monitoring compared with invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure during acute intracranial hypertension
    Sidi, A
    Messinger, G
    Mahla, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 1999, 15 (3-4) : 185 - 195
  • [5] Non-invasive Monitoring of Intracranial Pressure Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography: Is It Possible?
    Cardim, Danilo
    Robba, C.
    Bohdanowicz, M.
    Donnelly, J.
    Cabella, B.
    Liu, X.
    Cabeleira, M.
    Smielewski, P.
    Schmidt, B.
    Czosnyka, M.
    [J]. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2016, 25 (03) : 473 - 491
  • [6] Non-invasive Monitoring of Intracranial Pressure Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography: Is It Possible?
    Danilo Cardim
    C. Robba
    M. Bohdanowicz
    J. Donnelly
    B. Cabella
    X. Liu
    M. Cabeleira
    P. Smielewski
    B. Schmidt
    M. Czosnyka
    [J]. Neurocritical Care, 2016, 25 : 473 - 491
  • [7] Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
    Mueller, Sebastian Johannes
    Henkes, Elina
    Gounis, Matthew J.
    Felber, Stephan
    Ganslandt, Oliver
    Henkes, Hans
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [8] Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Methods during Pneumoperitoneum in an Animal Model
    Dip, Fernando
    Nguyen, David
    Lomenzo, Emanuele
    Szomstein, Samuel
    Szetter, Eugenia
    Rosenthal, Raul J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (03) : S62 - S63
  • [9] Comparison of invasive and non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring
    Hamarat, Y.
    Deimantavicius, M.
    Zakelis, R.
    Bartusis, L.
    Preiksaitis, A.
    Ragauska, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 60 - 60
  • [10] Non-invasive intracranial pulse wave monitoring
    Ragauskas, Arminas
    Daubaris, Gediminas
    Petkus, Vytautas
    Chomskis, Romanas
    Raisutis, Renaldas
    Deksnys, Vytautas
    Guzaitis, Jonas
    Lengvinas, Gintautas
    Matijosaitis, Vaidas
    [J]. INFORMATICA, 2008, 19 (03) : 391 - 402