Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position

被引:27
|
作者
Matsumoto, E [1 ]
Misaki, M [1 ]
Miyauchi, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansai Adv Res Ctr, Commun Res Lab, Brain Informat Grp, Nishi Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6512429, Japan
关键词
stimulus-response compatibility; reference frame; spatial coding; crossed-hand;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-004-1872-7
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous psychological experiments have indicated the existence of a visual-proprioceptive interaction in spatial stimulus-response compatibility (SSRC) tasks, but there is little specific information on the neural basis of such interaction in humans. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we compared the neural activity associated with two different aspects of spatial coding: the coding of the "internal" spatial position of motor-response effectors (i.e., the position of body parts) as obtained through proprioception, and the coding of "external" positions, i.e., the positions of visual stimuli. A 2x2 factorial design was used to investigate the spatial compatibility (incompatible versus compatible) between a visual stimulus and hand position (crossed versus uncrossed). The subjects were instructed to respond to stimuli presented to the right or left visual field with either the ipsilateral (compatible condition) or the contralateral hand (incompatible condition). The incompatible condition produced stronger activation in the bilateral superior parietal lobule, inferior parietal lobule, and bilateral superior frontal gyrus than the compatible condition. The crossed-hand condition produced stronger activation in the bilateral precentral gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, superior parietal lobule, and superior temporal gyrus than the uncrossed-hand condition. These results suggest that activity in the frontal-parietal regions is related to two functions: (1) representation of the visual stimulus-motor response spatial configuration in an SSRC task, and (2) integration between external visual and internal proprioceptive sensory information. The activation in the superior temporal gyrus was not affected by the visual stimulus-motor response spatial configuration in an SSRC task; rather, it was affected by the crossed-hand posture. Thus, it seems to be related to representing internal proprioceptive sensory information necessary to carry out motor actions.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 17
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus–response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position
    Eriko Matsumoto
    Masaya Misaki
    Satoru Miyauchi
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2004, 158 : 9 - 17
  • [2] Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: The effect of hand position
    Matsumoto, E
    Misaki, M
    Miyauchi, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, : 148 - 148
  • [3] Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms
    Ambrosecchia, Marianna
    Marino, Barbara F. M.
    Gawryszewski, Luiz G.
    Riggio, Lucia
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [4] ATTENTIONAL FOCUSING AND SPATIAL STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY
    STOFFER, TH
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1991, 53 (02): : 127 - 135
  • [5] Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and negative priming
    Read, LE
    Proctor, RW
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [6] Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and negative priming
    Lenore E. Read
    Robert W. Proctor
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004, 11 : 41 - 48
  • [7] STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY EFFECT RECONSIDERED
    COTTON, B
    TZENG, OJL
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1977, 10 (04) : 245 - 245
  • [8] Stimulus-response compatibility and position of the hands: Nonadditive effects
    Ghozlan, A
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1998, 86 (03) : 843 - 850
  • [9] Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: Is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence?
    Todd Eric Roswarski
    Robert W. Proctor
    [J]. Psychological Research, 2000, 63 : 148 - 158
  • [10] Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: Is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence?
    Roswarski, TE
    Proctor, RW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2000, 63 (02): : 148 - 158