Review of Salmonella detection and identification methods: Aspects of rapid emergency response and food safety

被引:269
|
作者
Lee, Kyung-Min [1 ]
Runyon, Mick [1 ]
Herrman, Timothy J. [1 ]
Phillips, Robert [2 ]
Hsieh, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ Syst, Texas AgriLife Res, Off Texas State Chem, College Stn, TX 77841 USA
[2] USDA, Food Safety & Inspect Serv, Athens, GA 30605 USA
关键词
Salmonella detection method; Food emergency response; Food safety; Foodborne illness; Public health; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; REAL-TIME PCR; 24-HOUR ENRICHMENT PROTOCOLS; PATHOGENIC BACTERIA; MULTIPLEX PCR; POULTRY; BIOSENSORS; CULTURE; ASSAY; SPP;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.07.011
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Salmonella has been recognized as a major and important foodborne pathogen for humans and animals over more than a century, causing human foodborne illness as well as high medical and economical cost. Accordingly, the effort to develop efficient and reliable Salmonella detection methods continues. This paper reviews and describes the development and application of commercially available Salmonella detection methods. These are categorized into several groups based on the principle applied: conventional culture methods, immunology-based assays, nucleic acid-based assays, miniaturized biochemical assays, and biosensors. Conventional culture methods serve as the basis in food testing laboratories despite rather laborious and time-consuming protocols. Considerable progress in rapid methods using emerging technologies yield faster answers and higher throughput of samples. This paper also shows and analyzes Salmonella test results and summarizes the features and limitations of the studies involving Salmonella detection methods developed for emergency response, mainly by food emergency response laboratories participating during recent fiscal years. The emergency response laboratories utilize Salmonella detection methods possessing properties that include simplicity, versatility, high sensitivity, good specificity, and cost efficiency. Collaboration of the food emergency response laboratories in the development of these technologies is important essentially to compare for the purpose of continually improving Salmonella detection methods. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 276
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Similarity matching of food safety incidents in China: Aspects of rapid emergency response and food safety
    Song, Ying-Hua
    Yu, Hui-Qin
    Tan, Yih-chi
    Lv, Wei
    Fang, Dan-Hui
    Liu, Dan
    FOOD CONTROL, 2020, 115
  • [2] Biosensors for rapid detection of Salmonella in food: A review
    Shen, Yafang
    Xu, Lizhou
    Li, Yanbin
    COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY, 2021, 20 (01) : 149 - 197
  • [3] Rapid detection and identification methods for Listeria monocytogenes in the food chain - A review
    Valimaa, Anna-Liisa
    Tilsala-Timisjarvi, Anu
    Virtanen, Elina
    FOOD CONTROL, 2015, 55 : 103 - 114
  • [4] Advancements in Detection Methods for Salmonella in Food: A Comprehensive Review
    Patel, Aayushi
    Wolfram, Andrew
    Desin, Taseen S.
    PATHOGENS, 2024, 13 (12):
  • [5] Progress in the validation of rapid food safety detection methods
    1600, Chinese Chamber of Commerce (37):
  • [7] Salmonella in food surveillance: PCR, immunoassays, and other rapid detection and quantification methods
    Cheung, Pui-Yi
    Kam, Kai Man
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 45 (02) : 802 - 808
  • [8] An overview of rapid detection methods for Salmonella
    Yang, Qian
    Zu, Jiaqi
    Zhang, Shuaihua
    Liu, Chang
    Qin, Xinhong
    Xu, Wentao
    FOOD CONTROL, 2025, 167
  • [9] Intelligent biosensing strategies for rapid detection in food safety: A review
    Zhang, Junjie
    Huang, Huixian
    Song, Guangchun
    Huang, Kunlun
    Luo, Yunbo
    Liu, Qingliang
    He, Xiaoyun
    Cheng, Nan
    BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 2022, 202
  • [10] Prospects for rapid bioluminescent detection methods in the food industry - a review
    Dostalek, P
    Branyik, T
    CZECH JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES, 2005, 23 (03) : 85 - 92