Willingness to Pay for Watershed Management

被引:17
|
作者
Abebe, S. T. [1 ]
Dagnew, A. B. [2 ]
Zeleke, V. G. [2 ]
Eshetu, G. Z. [2 ,3 ]
Cirella, G. T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Polo Ctr Sustainabil, I-18100 Imperia, Italy
[2] Addis Ababa Univ, Water & Land Resource Ctr, Addis Ababa 3880, Ethiopia
[3] Univ Bern, Ctr Dev & Environm, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Gdansk, Fac Econ, PL-81824 Sopot, Poland
来源
RESOURCES-BASEL | 2019年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
watershed management; willingness to pay (WTP); contingent valuation; sustainability; Ethiopia; CONTINGENT VALUATION; SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA; SOIL; CONSERVATION; ADOPTION; DETERMINANTS; TECHNOLOGY; SERVICE; EROSION; BASIN;
D O I
10.3390/resources8020077
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Equitable payments for ecosystem services are emerging as a viable tool to protect and restore ecosystems. Unlike previous studies using contingent valuation approach in Ethiopia, this study is unique in its scope and target users. It explores the possibility of payment for watershed services as an economic tool in supporting and promoting sustainable land management and financing community-based watershed investments from electric users at a national level. We examine the sensitivity of users' ability to generate funds for watershed services for sustainable watershed management through the raising of small amounts of money added onto a monthly electrical bill. Sampling frame covered four of the nine regional states of Ethiopia with more than 86% coverage dating back to 2014. A total of 501 urban and rural households and 100 organizations were interviewed over a five-year period from 2014-2019. We used a multistage sampling technique; we first selected cities, towns, and villages based on several data collection methodologies. The findings indicate that about 84% and 90% of households and organizations, respectively, showed their willingness to pay (WTP) additional fees for watershed management that could potentially reduce upland degradation and siltation. Specifically, more than half of the households and organizations and industries were willing to pay the surcharge for watershed management. Likewise, we developed a model estimation of results which verified the WTP amount, respectively. We concluded that funds generated from electric users play a possible role in contributing to the financing of watershed management efforts and could be taken as an important lesson for the watershed management continuum efforts Ethiopia-wide and in other countries.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Willingness to Pay For Improved Watershed Management: Evidence From Metro Manila, Philippines
    Calderon, Margaret M.
    Camacho, Leni D.
    Carandang, Myrna G.
    Dizon, Josefina T.
    Rebugio, Lucrecio L.
    Tolentino, Noel L.
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 2 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [2] Watershed Management Benefits in a Hypothetical, Real Intention and Real Willingness to Pay Approach
    Lehtoranta, Virpi
    Kosenius, Anna-Kaisa
    Seppala, Elina
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (13) : 4117 - 4132
  • [3] Watershed Management Benefits in a Hypothetical, Real Intention and Real Willingness to Pay Approach
    Virpi Lehtoranta
    Anna-Kaisa Kosenius
    Elina Seppälä
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2017, 31 : 4117 - 4132
  • [4] Willingness to Pay for Riparian Zones in an Ozark Watershed
    Lewis, Sarah E.
    Popp, Jennie S.
    English, Leah A.
    Odetola, Tolulope O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 143 (05)
  • [5] Stakeholder willingness to pay for watershed restoration in rural Bolivia
    Shultz, Steven
    Soliz, Bruno
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2007, 43 (04): : 947 - 956
  • [6] Parametric and Non-parametric Models To Estimate Households' Willingness To Pay For Improved Management of Watershed
    Carandang, Myrna G.
    Calderon, Margaret M.
    Camacho, Leni D.
    Dizon, Josefina T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 11 (02): : 68 - 78
  • [7] Willingness to pay for flood and ecological risk reduction in an urban watershed
    Clark, DE
    Novotny, V
    Griffin, R
    Booth, D
    Bartosová, A
    Daun, MC
    Hutchinson, M
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 45 (09) : 235 - 242
  • [8] Willingness to pay for watershed conservation: are we applying the right paradigm?
    Lalika, Makarius C. S.
    Meire, Patrick
    Ngaga, Yonika M.
    Sanga, Goddy J.
    [J]. ECOHYDROLOGY & HYDROBIOLOGY, 2017, 17 (01) : 33 - 45
  • [9] Estimating willingness to pay and resource tradeoffs with different payment mechanisms: An evaluation of a funding guarantee for watershed management
    Johnston, RJ
    Swallow, SK
    Weaver, TF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 38 (01) : 97 - 120
  • [10] Willingness to pay for water quality and supply enhancements in the Grand River watershed
    Univ of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
    [J]. Can Water Resour J, 3 (275-285):