Multidisciplinary fault diagnosis of complex engineering systems: A case study of nuclear power plants

被引:2
|
作者
Jia, Liu [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Qin [2 ]
Liu, Zhaopeng [1 ]
Tan, Haibo [1 ]
Zhou, Liwei [1 ]
机构
[1] China Nucl Power Engn Co Ltd, State Key Lab Nucl Power Safety Monitoring Techno, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fault diagnosis; Collaborative diagnosis; Multidisciplinary diagnosis; Complex engineering systems; KNOWLEDGE ELICITATION; HYPOTHESIS GENERATION; TEAM ORIENTATION; PERFORMANCE; WORK; REPRESENTATION; MECHANISMS; JUDGMENT; COORDINATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103060
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Fault diagnosis is a key process in ensuring complex engineering system safety. It often requires collaborative and multidisciplinary efforts. This study seeks to understand the process of multidisciplinary fault diagnosis in complex engineering systems and the key human factors issues that impair this process. Data were collected from multidisciplinary diagnostic activities conducted in the commissioning phase of nuclear power plants (NPPs). In the first phase, we proposed a process model based on a combination of literature review, specialist interviews, and field observations. In phase two, the influencing issues identified in the first phase were assessed through a survey with 117 NPP commissioning specialists. Five factors influencing multidisciplinary fault diagnosis were identified: cognitive artifacts, diagnosis biases, preparation for multidisciplinary diagnosis, information sharing and collaborative reasoning, and collaborative decision-making. The significances of each factor were compared. The results provide guidance for the development of improvement measures to enhance the performance of multidisciplinary fault diagnosis. Practitioner summary: The processes and influencing issues of multidisciplinary fault diagnosis during the commissioning phase of nuclear power plants were studied with field observations, interviews of 28 specialists, and a survey of 117 specialists. Five major influencing factors were identified, and their influences were compared.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on Design of Fault Diagnosis System for Nuclear Power Plants
    Wang T.
    Yu R.
    Liu X.
    [J]. 2018, Atomic Energy Press (39): : 176 - 179
  • [2] Distributed Fault Diagnosis Framework for Nuclear Power Plants
    Wu Guohua
    Duan Zhiyong
    Yuan Diping
    Yin Jiyao
    Liu Caixue
    Ji Dongxu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [3] SEMISUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION FOR FAULT DIAGNOSIS IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
    Ma, Jianping
    Jiang, Jin
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 47 (02) : 176 - 186
  • [4] Fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control in power plants and power systems
    Zhang, Jianhua
    Yue, Hong
    [J]. MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2006, 39 (06): : 171 - 177
  • [5] Application of genetic algorithms to fault diagnosis in nuclear power plants
    [J]. Zhou, Yangping, 2000, Elsevier Sci Ltd, Exeter, United Kingdom (67):
  • [6] Application of genetic algorithms to fault diagnosis in nuclear power plants
    Zhou, YP
    Zhou, BQ
    Wu, DX
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2000, 67 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [7] Fault diagnosis study on secondary system of nuclear power plants based on MFM model
    Ma, Jie
    Guo, Li-Feng
    Zhang, Yu-Sheng
    Peng, Qiao
    Li, Hai-Wei
    [J]. Hedongli Gongcheng/Nuclear Power Engineering, 2011, 32 (04): : 109 - 113
  • [8] DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING SYSTEMS IN NUCLEAR-POWER PLANTS
    WEHLING, HJ
    JAX, P
    STREICHER, V
    [J]. KERNENERGIE, 1988, 31 (03): : 99 - 106
  • [9] Research on fault simulation and fault diagnosis of electric gate valves in nuclear power plants
    Huang, Xue-Ying
    Liu, Yong-Kuo
    Xia, Hong
    Shan, Long-Fei
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2024, 208
  • [10] Applications of fault detection and diagnosis methods in nuclear power plants: A review
    Ma, Jianping
    Jiang, Jin
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2011, 53 (03) : 255 - 266