The Global Leadership Life Inventory: development and psychometric properties of a 360-degree feedback instrument

被引:36
|
作者
de Vries, MFRK [1 ]
Vrignaud, P
Florent-Treacy, E
机构
[1] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[2] INSEAD, Singapore, Singapore
[3] CNAM, INETOP, Paris, France
来源
关键词
360-degree leadership questionnaire; global leadership; developing leadership; measuring leadership effectiveness; dimensions of leadership; GlobeInvent;
D O I
10.1080/0958519042000181214
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to describe the design of Global Leadership Life Inventory (GlobeInvent), a 360-degree leadership feedback instrument. This instrument is presently used in executive programmes to help identify the operational mode of individual executives. Proper use of this instrument enables the user to determinate those areas of leadership behaviour where improvement is needed. Because most studies pay attention only to the surface manifestations of leadership, most leadership feedback instruments, in turn, are not concerned with the psychodynamic processes that underlie leaders' character and behaviour. To address this gap, the GlobeInvent is based on a clinical orientation to the study of leadership. This approach provides a more complete analysis of the 'inner theatre' of leaders - that is, what makes them tick - as well as measuring the dynamic, two-way relationship between leaders and followers. The first step in designing the instrument was to pinpoint significant themes pertaining to exemplary leadership. To that end, semi-structured interviews with senior executives were held. The leadership dimensions that emerged from that process were then tested on an international sample of senior executives. Analysis of the data from the testing confirmed the existence of twelve robust dimensions with a high reliability and internal consistency. Because the GlobeInvent is a 360-degree feedback instrument, this article addresses differences between 'Self' scores and scores given by others ('Observers'), gender differences in scoring and the influence of nationality, management experience and age on test results. The implications of using such an instrument as a 360-degree feedback tool are reviewed, and suggestions for future research are offered.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 492
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Leadership, managerial performance and 360-degree feedback
    Carless, SA
    Mann, L
    Wearing, AJ
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 1998, 47 (04): : 481 - 496
  • [2] Leadership Perception Analysis of 360-Degree Feedback
    Bradley, Thomas
    Allen, Jeff
    Hamilton, Scott
    Filgo, Scott
    [J]. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT QUARTERLY, 2006, 19 (01) : 7 - 23
  • [3] 360-degree feedback
    Ryschka, J
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ARBEITS-UND ORGANISATIONSPSYCHOLOGIE, 2004, 48 (02): : 99 - 100
  • [4] 360-DEGREE OF FEEDBACK
    Ertuerk, Safak-Deniz
    [J]. AKTUALNE POHL'ADY NA KONKURENCIESCHOPNOST' A PODNIKANIE - NOVE VYZVY, 2011, : 101 - 104
  • [5] Questionnaires for 360-degree assessment of consultant psychiatrists: development and psychometric properties
    Lelliott, Paul
    Williams, Richard
    Mears, Alex
    Andiappan, Manoharan
    Owen, Helen
    Reading, Paul
    Coyle, Nick
    Hunter, Stephen
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 193 (02) : 156 - 160
  • [6] Emergence, development and usefuluness of the 360-degree feedback
    Matuchet, S
    Somat, A
    Testé, B
    Lucet, E
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIE DU TRAVAIL ET DES ORGANISATIONS, 2005, 11 (04) : 211 - 226
  • [7] 360 degree feedback and leadership development
    Alimo-Metcalfe, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 1998, 6 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [8] 360 degree feedback and leadership development
    Atwater, L
    Waldman, D
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 1998, 9 (04): : 423 - 426
  • [9] The power of 360-degree feedback
    Dyer, KM
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 2001, 58 (05) : 35 - 38
  • [10] 360-degree feedback.
    Bracken, DW
    [J]. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) : 734 - 738