Relationship between tumor location, size, and WHO grade in meningioma

被引:96
|
作者
Magill, Stephen T. [1 ]
Young, Jacob S. [1 ]
Chae, Ricky [1 ]
Aghi, Manish K. [1 ]
Theodosopoulos, Philip V. [1 ]
McDermott, Michael W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
meningioma; convexity; parasagittal; skull base; tumor size; atypical; grade; location; TERT PROMOTER MUTATIONS; INTRACRANIAL MENINGIOMAS; ATYPICAL MENINGIOMAS; RISK-FACTORS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; METHYLATION; AKT1;
D O I
10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17752
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Prior studies have investigated preoperative risk factors for meningioma; however, no association has been shown between meningioma tumor size and tumor grade. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between tumor size and grade in a large single-center study of patients undergoing meningioma resection. METHODS A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing meningioma resection at the University of California, San Francisco, between 1985 and 2015 was performed. Patients with incomplete information, spinal meningiomas, multiple meningiomas, or WHO grade III meningiomas were excluded. The largest tumor dimension was used as a surrogate for tumor size. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between tumor grade and tumor size. A recursive partitioning analysis was performed to identify groups at higher risk for atypical (WHO grade II) meningioma. RESULTS Of the 1113 patients identified, 905 (81%) had a WHO grade I tumor and in 208 (19%) the tumors were WHO grade II. The median largest tumor dimension was 3.6 cm (range 0.2-13 cm). Tumors were distributed as follows: skull base (n = 573, 51%), convexity/falx/parasagittal (n = 431, 39%), and other (n = 109, 10%). On univariate regression, larger tumor size (p < 0.001), convexity/falx/parasagittal location (p < 0.001), and male sex (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of WHO grade II pathology. After controlling for interactions, multivariate regression found male sex (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.25-2.43), size 3-6 cm (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.08-2.66), size >6 cm (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.53-5.94), and convexity/falx/parasagittal location (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.19-2.82) to be significantly associated with WHO grade II. Recursive partitioning analysis identified male patients with tumors > 3 cm as a high-risk group (32%) for WHO grade II meningioma. CONCLUSIONS Larger tumor size is associated with a greater likelihood of a meningioma being WHO grade II, independent of tumor location and male sex, which are known risk factors.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MENINGIOMA SIZE IS POSITIVELY CORRELATED WITH TUMOR WHO GRADE
    Kocyigit, Said
    Orhun, Omer
    Yasar, Ahmet Harun
    Danyeli, Ayca Ersen
    Dincer, Alp
    Pamir, Necmettin
    Ozduman, Koray
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 26
  • [2] Relationship between apathy and tumor location, size, and brain edema in patients with intracranial meningioma
    Peng, Yihua
    Shao, Chunhong
    Gong, Ye
    Wu, Xuehai
    Tang, Weijun
    Shi, Shenxun
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2015, 11 : 1685 - 1693
  • [3] WHO grade 1 meningioma recurrence: Are location and Simpson grade still relevant?
    Gallagher, Mathew J.
    Jenkinson, Michael D.
    Brodbelt, Andrew R.
    Mills, Samantha J.
    Chavredakis, Emmanuel
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 141 : 117 - 121
  • [4] WHO grade, proliferation index, and progesterone receptor expression are different according to the location of meningioma
    Maiuri, Francesco
    Mariniello, Giuseppe
    Guadagno, Elia
    Barbato, Marcello
    Corvino, Sergio
    De Caro, Marialaura Del Basso
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2019, 161 (12) : 2553 - 2561
  • [5] WHO grade, proliferation index, and progesterone receptor expression are different according to the location of meningioma
    Francesco Maiuri
    Giuseppe Mariniello
    Elia Guadagno
    Marcello Barbato
    Sergio Corvino
    Marialaura Del Basso De Caro
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2019, 161 : 2553 - 2561
  • [6] Proposal for a new risk stratification classification for meningioma based on patient age, WHO tumor grade, size, localization, and karyotype
    Henriques Domingues, Patricia
    Sousa, Pablo
    Otero, Alvaro
    Maria Goncalves, Jesus
    Ruiz, Laura
    de Oliveira, Catarina
    Lopes, Maria Celeste
    Orfao, Alberto
    Dolores Tabernero, Maria
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (05) : 735 - 747
  • [7] Is There Any Relationship Between Systemic Inflammatory Markers And Meningioma Grade?
    Manjunath, Niveditha
    Mishra, Shashwat
    Garg, Kanwaljeet
    Suri, Vaishali
    Sharma, Mehar Chand
    Tandon, Vivek
    Singh, Manmohan
    Suri, Ashish
    Chandra, P. Sarat
    Kale, Shashank Sharad
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 223 - 230
  • [8] WHO grade of intracranial meningiomas differs with respect to patient’s age, location, tumor size and peritumoral edema
    Anne Ressel
    Susanne Fichte
    Michael Brodhun
    Steffen K. Rosahl
    Ruediger Gerlach
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2019, 145 : 277 - 286
  • [9] WHO grade of intracranial meningiomas differs with respect to patient's age, location, tumor size and peritumoral edema
    Ressel, Anne
    Fichte, Susanne
    Brodhun, Michael
    Rosahl, Steffen K.
    Gerlach, Ruediger
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 145 (02) : 277 - 286
  • [10] Association Between Nephrolith Size and Location and Grade of Hydronephrosis
    Alshoabi, Sultan Abdulwadoud
    Binnuhaid, Abdulkhaleq Ayedh
    Almohtadi, Abdullatif Mothanna
    Muslem, Halah Fuad
    Hamid, Abdullgabbar M.
    Alhazmi, Fahad H.
    Qurashi, Abdulaziz A.
    Alsharif, Walaa M.
    Gareeballah, Awadia
    Alzain, Amel F.
    Elzaki, Maisa
    Elsayed, Abdalrahim Tagelsir
    Althobaiti, Salman
    LIFE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (02):