Comparison of Validity of Mapping between Drug Indications and ICD-10 Direct and Indirect Terminology Based Approaches

被引:5
|
作者
Choi, Y. [1 ]
Jung, C. [1 ]
Chae, Y. [2 ]
Kang, M. [1 ]
Kim, J. [3 ]
Joung, K. [3 ]
Lim, J. [3 ]
Cho, S. [3 ]
Sung, S. [3 ]
Lee, E. [4 ]
Kim, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Seoul 137701, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Seoul 120749, South Korea
[3] KIMS Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Pharm, Suwon, South Korea
关键词
Drug indication database; semantic mapping; International Classification of Diseases (ICD);
D O I
10.3414/ME13-01-0053
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: Mapping of drug indications to ICD-10 was undertaken in Korea by a public and a private institution for their own purposes. A different mapping approach was used by each institution, which presented a good opportunity to compare the validity of the two approaches. Objectives: This study was undertaken to compare the validity of a direct mapping approach and an indirect terminology based mapping approach of drug indications against the gold standard drawn from the results of the two mapping processes. Methods: Three hundred and seventy-five cardiovascular reference drugs were selected from all listed cardiovascular drugs for the study. In the direct approach, two experienced nurse coders mapped the free text indications directly to ICD-10. In the indirect terminology based approach, the indications were extracted and coded in the Korean Standard Terminology of Medicine. These terminology coded indications were then manually mapped to ICD-10. The results of the two approaches were compared to the gold standard. A kappa statistic was calculated to see the compatibility of both mapping approaches. Recall, precision and Fl score of each mapping approach were calculated and analyzed using a paired t-test. Results: The mean number of indications for the study drugs was 5.42. The mean number of ICD-10 codes that matched in direct approach was 46.32 and that of indirect terminology based approach was 56.94. The agreement of the mapping results between the two approaches were poor (kappa = 0.19). The indirect terminology based approach showed higher recall (86.78%) than direct approach (p <0.001). However, there was no difference in precision and Fl score between the two approaches. Conclusions: Considering no differences in the Fl scores, both approaches may be used in practice for mapping drug indications to ICD-b. However, in terms of consistency, time and manpower, better results are expected from the indirect terminology based approach.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Semi-Automated Approach for Multilingual Terminology Matching: Mapping the French Version of the ICD-10 to the ICD-10 CM
    Sylvestre, Emmanuelle
    Bouzille, Guillaume
    Mcduffie, Michael
    Chazard, Emmanuel
    Avillach, Paul
    Cuggia, Marc
    DIGITAL PERSONALIZED HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2020, 270 : 18 - 22
  • [2] Comparison of data on drug abuse diagnosed according to ICD-8 and ICD-10, respectively
    Hansen, SS
    Perto, G
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 13 (05) : 242 - 245
  • [3] An Algorithmic Approach to Create Bi-directional Mapping Files Between ICD-10 and ICD-10-AM
    Shafruddin, Hafiz
    Ginige, Jeewani A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AUSTRALASIAN COMPUTER SCIENCE WEEK MULTICONFERENCE (ACSW 2020), 2020,
  • [4] Diagnosing dementia - ICD-10 not so bad after all: a comparison between dementia criteria according to DSM-IV and ICD-10
    Naik, Mala
    Nygaard, Harald A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 23 (03) : 279 - 282
  • [5] Semantic Mapping Model between ICD-10 and SNOMED-CT Health Terminologies
    Gualdani, Fabricio Amadeu
    Botega, Leonardo Castro
    Miranda, Nelson Julio de Oliveira
    Ferreira, Allan
    Peres, Reinaldo Porte
    EM QUESTAO, 2024, 30
  • [6] Geographic atrophy diagnosis in the IRIS® Registry: a comparison between images and ICD-10 codes
    Chu, Zhongdi
    Le, Kim
    Leng, Theodore
    Borkar, Durga
    Candano, Carlos
    Ramakrishnan, Aishwarya
    Khapare, Ketki
    Mbagwu, Michael
    Torres, Aracelis
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (09)
  • [7] Improving Cervical Precancer Surveillance: Validity of Claims-Based Prediction Models in ICD-9 and ICD-10 Eras
    Shing, Jaimie Z.
    Griffin, Marie R.
    Nguyen, Linh D.
    Slaughter, James C.
    Mitchel, Edward F.
    Pemmaraju, Manideepthi
    Rentuza, Alyssa B.
    Hull, Pamela C.
    JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [8] Prescribing errors in patients with documented drug allergies: comparison of ICD-10 coding and written patient notes
    Benkhaial, Arwa
    Kaltschmidt, Jens
    Weisshaar, Elke
    Diepgen, Thomas L.
    Haefeli, Walter E.
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2009, 31 (04): : 464 - 472
  • [9] Prescribing errors in patients with documented drug allergies: comparison of ICD-10 coding and written patient notes
    Arwa Benkhaial
    Jens Kaltschmidt
    Elke Weisshaar
    Thomas L. Diepgen
    Walter E. Haefeli
    Pharmacy World & Science, 2009, 31 : 464 - 472
  • [10] Disease identification based on ambulatory drugs dispensation and in-hospital ICD-10 diagnoses: a comparison
    Patricia Halfon
    Yves Eggli
    Anne Decollogny
    Erol Seker
    BMC Health Services Research, 13