Paternalism and pseudo-rationality: An illustration based on retirement savings

被引:2
|
作者
Fadlon, Itzik [1 ,2 ]
Laibson, David [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA USA
[2] NBER, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Littauer Ctr, Dept Econ, 1805 Cambridge St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Paternalism; Consumption; Savings; Social planner; Optimization; Myopia; Passivity; BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION; SMOOTH CONSUMPTION; SELF-CONTROL; PARTICIPATION; DEFAULTS; ACCOUNTS; POLICY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104763
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Resource allocations are jointly determined by the actions of social planners and households. We study economies in which households have private information about their tastes and have a distribution of behavioral propensities: optimal, myopic, or passive. In such economies, we show that utilitarian plan-ners enact policies such as Social Security and default savings that cause equilibrium consumption smoothing (on average in the cross-section of households). Our framework resolves tensions in the household savings literature by simultaneously explaining evidence of consumption smoothing and opti-mal savings on average across households while also predicting behavioral anomalies at the household level. In general, common tests of consumption smoothing are not sufficient to show that households are optimizers, but observational data or natural experiments can be used to identify the fractions of opti-mizing, myopic, and passive households.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 5 条