Cost and benefit analysis of space debris mitigation measures

被引:6
|
作者
Wiedemann, C
Oswald, M
Bendisch, J
Sdunnus, H
Vörsmann, P
机构
[1] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Aerosp Syst, ILR, D-38108 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Aerodata AG, Braunschweig, Germany
[3] Eta Max Space GMBH, Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.011
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The increasing number of orbital debris objects is a risk for satellites. To reduce the risks for future space missions several mitigation strategies have been developed during the last years. In this paper the long-term cost development of space debris mitigation measures is analyzed. Different mitigation scenarios are defined and compared. Cost models are derived for mitigation measures and for the loss of amortization in the case of hypervelocity impacts on operating satellites. Long-term simulations of the space debris environment based on a conservative orbital traffic model have been made for a 50 years time interval beginning in 2001. The simulations consider different mitigation scenarios. The output data have been combined with the cost models. The mitigation scenarios were compared, and a cost-benefit analysis has been performed. The result of the investigation is, that the most effective mitigation measures are passivation (suppression of fragmentation events) and slag prevention. (C) 2003 International Astronautical Federation. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:311 / 324
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost and benefit analysis of space debris mitigation measures
    Wiedemann, C
    Oswald, M
    Bendisch, J
    Sdunnus, H
    Vörsmann, P
    SPACE DEBRIS AND SPACE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM 2003, 2004, 109 : 429 - 448
  • [2] Analysis of debris mitigation scenarios in terms of cost and benefit
    Bendisch, J
    Wegener, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SPACE DEBRIS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, 473 : 717 - 722
  • [3] Energetic cost and viability of the proposed space debris mitigation measures
    Rossi, A
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2002, 39 (04) : 540 - 550
  • [4] Energetic cost and viability of the proposed space debris mitigation measures
    Rossi, A
    SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2001, VOL 108, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 108 : 283 - 303
  • [5] Space debris mitigation measures in India
    Adimurthy, V
    Ganeshan, AS
    SPACE DEBRIS AND SPACE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM 2003, 2004, 109 : 483 - 492
  • [6] Space debris mitigation measures in India
    Adimurthy, V
    Ganeshan, AS
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2006, 58 (03) : 168 - 174
  • [7] COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS OF LNG VAPOR MITIGATION MEASURES
    ATALLAH, S
    SHAH, JN
    BETTI, M
    WILLIAMS, TA
    AGA 1989 OPERATING SECTION PROCEEDINGS, 1989, : 506 - 512
  • [8] The historical effectiveness of space debris mitigation measures
    Johnson, Nicholas L.
    Space Debris and Space Traffic Management Symposium 2005, 2006, 112 : 273 - 281
  • [9] Analysis of the effectiveness of space debris mitigation measures using the DELTA model
    Walker, R
    Martin, CE
    Stokes, PH
    Wilkinson, JE
    Klinkrad, H
    SPACE DEBRIS, 2001, 28 (09): : 1437 - 1445
  • [10] Space debris mitigation measures applied to European launchers
    Bonnal, Christophe
    Gigou, Jacques
    Aubin, Didier
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2009, 65 (11-12) : 1679 - 1688