Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis

被引:96
|
作者
Bunn, Frances [1 ]
Goodman, Claire [1 ]
Russell, Bridget [1 ]
Wilson, Patricia [2 ]
Manthorpe, Jill [3 ]
Rait, Greta [4 ]
Hodkinson, Isabel [5 ]
Durand, Marie-Anne [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Ctr Res Publ Hlth & Community Care, Coll Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[2] Univ Kent, Ctr Hlth Serv Studies, Canterbury CT2 7NF, Kent, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Social Care Workforce Res Unit, London WC2B 4LL, England
[4] UCL Med Sch, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Royal Free Campus,Rowland Hill St, London NW3 2PF, England
[5] Tredegar Practice, Tower Hamlets Clin Commissioning Grp, London E3 5JD, England
[6] Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Preference Lab, Level 5,Williamson Translat Res Bldg, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
Shared decision making; Person-centred care; Realist synthesis; Multimorbidity; Older people; CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RISK COMMUNICATION AIDS; INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION; CENTERED CARE; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; SKILL DEVELOPMENT; PATIENT; ADULTS; MODEL; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-018-0853-9
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Health care systems are increasingly moving towards more integrated approaches. Shared decision making (SDM) is central to these models but may be complicated by the need to negotiate and communicate decisions between multiple providers, as well as patients and their family carers; particularly for older people with complex needs. The aim of this review was to provide a context relevant understanding of how interventions to facilitate SDM might work for older people with multiple health and care needs, and how they might be applied in integrated care models. Methods: Iterative, stakeholder driven, realist synthesis following RAMESES publication standards. It involved: 1) scoping literature and stakeholder interviews (n = 13) to develop initial programme theory/ies, 2) systematic searches for evidence to test and develop the theories, and 3) validation of programme theory/ies with stakeholders (n = 11). We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google, Google Scholar, and undertook lateral searches. All types of evidence were included. Results: We included 88 papers; 29 focused on older people or people with complex needs. We identified four context-mechanism-outcome configurations that together provide an account of what needs to be in place for SDM to work for older people with complex needs. This includes: understanding and assessing patient and carer values and capacity to access and use care, organising systems to support and prioritise SDM, supporting and preparing patients and family carers to engage in SDM and a person-centred culture of which SDM is a part. Programmes likely to be successful in promoting SDM are those that allow older people to feel that they are respected and understood, and that engender confidence to engage in SDM. Conclusions: To embed SDM in practice requires a radical shift from a biomedical focus to a more person-centred ethos. Service providers will need support to change their professional behaviour and to better organise and deliver services. Face to face interactions, permission and space to discuss options, and continuity of patient-professional relationships are key in supporting older people with complex needs to engage in SDM. Future research needs to focus on inter-professional approaches to SDM and how families and carers are involved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis
    Frances Bunn
    Claire Goodman
    Bridget Russell
    Patricia Wilson
    Jill Manthorpe
    Greta Rait
    Isabel Hodkinson
    Marie-Anne Durand
    [J]. BMC Geriatrics, 18
  • [2] Supporting shared decision-making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a protocol for a realist synthesis to inform integrated care models
    Bunn, Frances
    Goodman, Claire
    Manthorpe, Jill
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Hodkinson, Isabel
    Rait, Greta
    Millac, Paul
    Davies, Sue L.
    Russell, Bridget
    Wilson, Patricia
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (02):
  • [3] Engaging Older Adults in Health Care Decision-Making: A Realist Synthesis
    Elliott, Jacobi
    McNeil, Heather
    Ashbourne, Jessica
    Huson, Kelsey
    Boscart, Veronique
    Stolee, Paul
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (05): : 383 - 393
  • [4] Engaging Older Adults in Health Care Decision-Making: A Realist Synthesis
    Jacobi Elliott
    Heather McNeil
    Jessica Ashbourne
    Kelsey Huson
    Veronique Boscart
    Paul Stolee
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2016, 9 : 383 - 393
  • [5] Making health care responsive to the needs of older people
    Bridges, Jackie
    Pope, Catherine
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2019, 48 (06) : 785 - 788
  • [6] Health and social care decision-making: do older people want to participate?
    Corner, L
    Bond, J
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 1999, 32 (02): : 179 - 179
  • [7] Shared decision making needs a care perspective
    Olthuis, Gert
    Leget, Carlo
    Grypdonck, Mieke
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [8] Deprescribing, shared decision-making, and older people: perspectives in primary care
    Alrawiai, Sumaiah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [9] Deprescribing, shared decision-making, and older people: perspectives in primary care
    Sumaiah Alrawiai
    [J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 16
  • [10] Shared Decision-Making and Health Care Expenditures Among Children With Special Health Care Needs
    Fiks, Alexander G.
    Mayne, Stephanie
    Localio, A. Russell
    Alessandrini, Evaline A.
    Guevara, James P.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2012, 129 (01) : 99 - 107