Modeling the effects of fishery management and marine protected areas on the Beibu Gulf using spatial ecosystem simulation

被引:72
|
作者
Chen, Zuozhi [1 ]
Xu, Shannan [2 ]
Qiu, Yongsong [1 ]
Lin, Zhaojin [1 ]
Jia, Xiaoping [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Fishery Sci, S China Sea Fisheries Res Inst, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecospace; Fishery management; Marine protected areas (MPAs); Fishing sectors; Beibu Gulf; Spatial ecosystem simulation; ECOPATH; IMPACTS; ECOSIM; DYNAMICS; RESERVES; ECOSPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fishres.2009.08.001
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The Gulf of Beibu, recognized as one of the traditional fishing grounds. is a center of rich biodiversity in the northern South China Sea. Based on the Beibu Gulf ecosystem constructed by the Ecopath and Ecosim model (in the late 1990s), we used Ecospace to evaluate the existing fishery management system and assess the potential of marine protected areas (MPAs) in the Beibu Gulf over a short (5-year), medium (10-year), and long-term (20-year) scenario. The results suggest that the current trawl closure and the midsummer moratorium system used in the Gulf fishery management approach appear to offer minimal benefits for stock recovery because of the high implementation and administrative costs; also, the biomass of valuable groups would decrease drastically with simulation time, and the large predator groups, such as the large demersal and pelagic fishes, would even be reduced to depletion in the long-term (20-year) simulation. Simulations of MPAs indicate that outcomes beneficial to all are possible but not guaranteed. Both 'no-take' MPAs, inshore closures (<30-m isobath) and offshore closures (common fishing zone) can drastically reduce fishing effort (between 20% and 30% reduction from 1999 levels), achieving much to avert the collapse of the fishery sector, especially for large-sized, high-value species. The magnitude of the biomass and the catches would obviously increase with simulation time. In a 20-year simulation, the total catches of all fishing gears would be doubled in the inshore closure simulation compared with that of offshore closure simulation with biomass recovery. The results suggest that, for purposes of fishery management in the Gulf, the inshore area within the 30-m isobath should be considered as 'no-take' MPAs; this may be an effective management tactic to conserve the ecosystem and to stop the decline in fisheries resources. Considering the complexity of ecosystem-based fishery management, an extension of the current work will incorporate the costs associated with restoration and monitoring efforts as well. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 229
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marine Protected Areas as a tool for fishery management and ecosystem conservation: an Introduction
    Hoffmann, Erik
    Perez-Ruzafa, Angel
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2009, 66 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [2] Marine protected areas in the Gulf of Maine: Providing a framework for an ecosystem approach to management
    Brody, SD
    Nicholson, B
    [J]. ON THE FRONTIERS OF CONSERVATION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PARKS AND ON PUBLIC LANDS, 1999, : 163 - 170
  • [3] The biodiversity value of marine protected areas for multi-species fishery management in the Gulf of Maine
    Cook, Rosamonde R.
    Auster, Peter J.
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2013, 23 (03) : 429 - 440
  • [4] Exploring the potential effects of marine protected areas on the ecosystem structure of the Gulf of Gabes using the Ecospace model
    Abdou, Khaled
    Halouani, Ghassen
    Hattab, Tarek
    Romdhane, Mohamed Salah
    Lasram, Frida Ben Rais
    Le Loc'h, Francois
    [J]. AQUATIC LIVING RESOURCES, 2016, 29 (02)
  • [5] Addressing ecosystem effects of fishing using marine protected areas
    Sumaila, UR
    Guénette, S
    Alder, J
    Chuenpagdee, R
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2000, 57 (03) : 752 - 760
  • [6] Marine protected areas and the value of spatially optimized fishery management
    Rassweiler, Andrew
    Costello, Christopher
    Siegel, David A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (29) : 11884 - 11889
  • [7] Artisanal fishery of elasmobranchs within two marine protected areas in the Upper Gulf of California
    Aragon Noriega, E. A.
    Cisneros Mata, M. A.
    Rodriguez Quiroz, G.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES, 2012, 59 (04): : 1 - 6
  • [8] MEASURING THE PERFORMANCE OF SPATIAL MANAGEMENT IN MARINE PROTECTED AREAS
    Kemp, Jodie
    Jenkins, Gregory P.
    Smith, David C.
    Fulton, Elizabeth
    [J]. OCEANOGRAPHY AND MARINE BIOLOGY: AN ANNUAL REVIEW, VOL 50, 2012, 50 : 287 - 314
  • [9] The effects of marine protected areas on ecosystem recovery and fisheries using a comparative modelling approach
    Vilas, Daniel
    Coll, Marta
    Corrales, Xavier
    Steenbeek, Jeroen
    Piroddi, Chiara
    Calo, Antonio
    Di Franco, Antonio
    Font, Toni
    Guidetti, Paolo
    Ligas, Alessandro
    Lloret, Josep
    Prato, Giulia
    Sahyoun, Rita
    Sartor, Paolo
    Claudet, Joachim
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2020, 30 (10) : 1885 - 1901
  • [10] Developing Spatial Management Tools for Offshore Marine Protected Areas
    Douglas, K.
    Juniper, S. K.
    Jenkyns, R.
    Hillier, J.
    [J]. OCEANS 2017 - ANCHORAGE, 2017,