Satisfaction and Regret After Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Editorial Comment

被引:0
|
作者
Schroeck, F. R. [1 ]
Krupski, T. L. [1 ]
Sun, L. [1 ]
Albala, D. M. [1 ]
Price, M. M. [1 ]
Polascik, T. J. [1 ]
Robertson, C. N. [1 ]
Tewari, A. K. [1 ]
Moul, J. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Duke Prostate Ctr,Div Urol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2009年 / 181卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To counsel patients adequately, it is important to understand the variables influencing satisfaction and regret following prostatectomy. Objective: To identify independent predictors for satisfaction and regret after radical prostatectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients who had undergone retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) between 2000 and 2007 were mailed cross-sectional surveys composed of sociodemographic information, the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and questions regarding satisfaction and regret. Measurements: Sociodemographic variables, perioperative complications, type of procedure, length of follow-up, and EPIC scores were evaluated as independent predictors of satisfaction and regret in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results and Limitations: A total of 400 patients responded (response rate 61%) of whom 84% were satisfied and 19% regretted their treatment choice. In multivariate analysis, lower income (odds ratio [OR], 0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.23), shorter follow-up (OR, 0.63; 95% Cl, 0.41-0.98), having undergone RRP versus RALP (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.90-10.4)], urinary domain scores (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.60-4.54), and hormonal domain scores (OR, 2.01; 95% Cl, 1.30-3.12) were independently associated with satisfaction (p < or = 0.039). In terms of regret, RALP versus RRP (OR, 3.02; 95% Cl, 1.50-6.07), lower urinary domain scores (OR, 0.58; 95% Cl, 0.37-0.91) and hormonal domain scores (OR, 0.67; 95% Cl, 0.45-0.98), and years since surgery (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.13-2.36) were again predictive (p < or = 0.041). African American race (OR, 3.58; 95% Cl, 1.52-8.43) and lower bowel domain scores (OR, 0.73; 95% Cl, 0.55-0.97) were also independently associated with regret (p < or = 0.028). Conclusions: Sociodemographic variables and quality of life were important variables associated with satisfaction and regret. Patients who underwent RALP were more likely to be regretful and dissatisfied, possibly because of higher expectation of an "innovative" procedure. We suggest that urologists carefully portray the risks and benefits of new technologies during preoperative counseling to minimize regret and maximize satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:2537 / 2538
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Satisfaction and Regret After Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Comment
    Penson, David F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (03): : 1126 - 1126
  • [2] Satisfaction and Regret After Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Comment
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02): : 636 - 636
  • [3] Satisfaction and Regret after Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Schroeck, Florian R.
    Krupski, Tracey L.
    Sun, Leon
    Albala, David M.
    Price, Marva M.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Robertson, Cary N.
    Tewari, Alok K.
    Moul, Judd W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (04) : 785 - 793
  • [4] Satisfaction and Regret After Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Schroeck, F. R.
    Krupski, T. L.
    Sun, L.
    Albala, D. M.
    Price, M. M.
    Polascik, T. J.
    Robertson, C. N.
    Tewari, A. K.
    Moul, J. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02): : 635 - 636
  • [5] Is There Any Evidence of Superiority between Retropubic, Laparoscopic or Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy? EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Tsivian, Matvey
    Tsivian, Alexander
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2011, 37 (02): : 159 - 160
  • [6] Response to Editorial Comment to Predictors of operative time during radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Howard, Lauren E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (08) : 624 - 625
  • [7] Salvage Radiotherapy After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Mobley, Jonathan M.
    Benway, Brian M.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2013, 82 (04) : 838 - 839
  • [8] Patient Satisfaction and Regret After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Decision Regret Analysis
    Lindsay, Jamie
    Uribe, Santiago
    Moschonas, Dimitrios
    Pavlakis, Pavlos
    Perry, Matthew
    Patil, Krishnaji
    Kusuma, Venkata R. M.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2021, 149 : 122 - 128
  • [9] Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy and Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Strasser, Mary O.
    Al Awamlh, Bashir Al Hussein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (01): : 40 - 40
  • [10] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy in obese patients.
    Le, C. Q.
    Slezak, J. M.
    Ho, K. V.
    Gettman, M. T.
    Blute, M. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A224 - A224